Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived c...

Electronic data

  • Jones_et_al_Stocks_and_Flows_R2_2015_12_09_before_DOI

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 52, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

    Accepted author manuscript, 410 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • L. Jones
  • L. Norton
  • Z. Austin
  • A. l. Browne
  • D. Donovan
  • B. A. Emmett
  • Z. J. Grabowski
  • D. C. Howard
  • J. P. G. Jones
  • J. O. Kenter
  • W. Manley
  • C. Morris
  • D. A. Robinson
  • C. Short
  • G .M. Siriwardena
  • C. J. Stevens
  • J. Storkey
  • R. D. Waters
  • G. F. Willis
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>03/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Land Use Policy
Volume52
Number of pages12
Pages (from-to)151-162
<mark>State</mark>Published
Early online date29/12/15
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

There is growing interest in the role that natural capital plays in underpinning ecosystem services. Yet, there remain differences and inconsistencies in the conceptualisation of capital and ecosystem services and the role that humans play in their delivery. Using worked examples in a stocks and flows systems approach, we show that both natural capital (NC) and human-derived (produced, human, social, cultural, financial) capital (HDC) are necessary to create ecosystem services at many levels. HDC plays a role at three stages of ecosystem service delivery. Firstly, as essential elements of a combined social-ecological system to create a potential ecosystem service. Secondly, through the beneficiaries in shaping the demand for that service. Thirdly, in the form of additional capital required to realise the ecosystem service flow. We show that it is possible, although not always easy, to separately identify how these forms of capital contribute to ecosystem service flow. We discuss how applying a systems approach can help identify critical natural capital and critical human-derived capital to guide sustainable management of the stocks and flows of all forms of capital which underpin provision of multiple ecosystem services. The amount of realised ecosystem service can be managed in several ways: via the NC & HDC which govern the potential service, and via factors which govern both the demand from the beneficiaries, and the efficiency of use of the potential service by those beneficiaries.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 52, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014