Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived c...

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • Jones_et_al_Stocks_and_Flows_R2_2015_12_09_before_DOI

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 52, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

    Accepted author manuscript, 411 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. / Jones, L.; Norton, L.; Austin, Z. et al.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 52, 03.2016, p. 151-162.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Jones, L, Norton, L, Austin, Z, Browne, AL, Donovan, D, Emmett, BA, Grabowski, ZJ, Howard, DC, Jones, JPG, Kenter, JO, Manley, W, Morris, C, Robinson, DA, Short, C, Siriwardena, GM, Stevens, CJ, Storkey, J, Waters, RD & Willis, GF 2016, 'Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services', Land Use Policy, vol. 52, pp. 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

APA

Jones, L., Norton, L., Austin, Z., Browne, A. L., Donovan, D., Emmett, B. A., Grabowski, Z. J., Howard, D. C., Jones, J. P. G., Kenter, J. O., Manley, W., Morris, C., Robinson, D. A., Short, C., Siriwardena, G. . M., Stevens, C. J., Storkey, J., Waters, R. D., & Willis, G. F. (2016). Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 52, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

Vancouver

Jones L, Norton L, Austin Z, Browne AL, Donovan D, Emmett BA et al. Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land Use Policy. 2016 Mar;52:151-162. Epub 2015 Dec 29. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

Author

Jones, L. ; Norton, L. ; Austin, Z. et al. / Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. In: Land Use Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 52. pp. 151-162.

Bibtex

@article{d47c67d342554c3bac44e877eb1fab60,
title = "Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services",
abstract = "There is growing interest in the role that natural capital plays in underpinning ecosystem services. Yet, there remain differences and inconsistencies in the conceptualisation of capital and ecosystem services and the role that humans play in their delivery. Using worked examples in a stocks and flows systems approach, we show that both natural capital (NC) and human-derived (produced, human, social, cultural, financial) capital (HDC) are necessary to create ecosystem services at many levels. HDC plays a role at three stages of ecosystem service delivery. Firstly, as essential elements of a combined social-ecological system to create a potential ecosystem service. Secondly, through the beneficiaries in shaping the demand for that service. Thirdly, in the form of additional capital required to realise the ecosystem service flow. We show that it is possible, although not always easy, to separately identify how these forms of capital contribute to ecosystem service flow. We discuss how applying a systems approach can help identify critical natural capital and critical human-derived capital to guide sustainable management of the stocks and flows of all forms of capital which underpin provision of multiple ecosystem services. The amount of realised ecosystem service can be managed in several ways: via the NC & HDC which govern the potential service, and via factors which govern both the demand from the beneficiaries, and the efficiency of use of the potential service by those beneficiaries.",
keywords = "Nature capital, Human capital , Scale, Sustainable, Beneficiaries, Potential Service",
author = "L. Jones and L. Norton and Z. Austin and Browne, {A. l.} and D. Donovan and Emmett, {B. A.} and Grabowski, {Z. J.} and Howard, {D. C.} and Jones, {J. P. G.} and Kenter, {J. O.} and W. Manley and C. Morris and Robinson, {D. A.} and C. Short and Siriwardena, {G .M.} and Stevens, {C. J.} and J. Storkey and Waters, {R. D.} and Willis, {G. F.}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 52, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "151--162",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services

AU - Jones, L.

AU - Norton, L.

AU - Austin, Z.

AU - Browne, A. l.

AU - Donovan, D.

AU - Emmett, B. A.

AU - Grabowski, Z. J.

AU - Howard, D. C.

AU - Jones, J. P. G.

AU - Kenter, J. O.

AU - Manley, W.

AU - Morris, C.

AU - Robinson, D. A.

AU - Short, C.

AU - Siriwardena, G .M.

AU - Stevens, C. J.

AU - Storkey, J.

AU - Waters, R. D.

AU - Willis, G. F.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 52, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - There is growing interest in the role that natural capital plays in underpinning ecosystem services. Yet, there remain differences and inconsistencies in the conceptualisation of capital and ecosystem services and the role that humans play in their delivery. Using worked examples in a stocks and flows systems approach, we show that both natural capital (NC) and human-derived (produced, human, social, cultural, financial) capital (HDC) are necessary to create ecosystem services at many levels. HDC plays a role at three stages of ecosystem service delivery. Firstly, as essential elements of a combined social-ecological system to create a potential ecosystem service. Secondly, through the beneficiaries in shaping the demand for that service. Thirdly, in the form of additional capital required to realise the ecosystem service flow. We show that it is possible, although not always easy, to separately identify how these forms of capital contribute to ecosystem service flow. We discuss how applying a systems approach can help identify critical natural capital and critical human-derived capital to guide sustainable management of the stocks and flows of all forms of capital which underpin provision of multiple ecosystem services. The amount of realised ecosystem service can be managed in several ways: via the NC & HDC which govern the potential service, and via factors which govern both the demand from the beneficiaries, and the efficiency of use of the potential service by those beneficiaries.

AB - There is growing interest in the role that natural capital plays in underpinning ecosystem services. Yet, there remain differences and inconsistencies in the conceptualisation of capital and ecosystem services and the role that humans play in their delivery. Using worked examples in a stocks and flows systems approach, we show that both natural capital (NC) and human-derived (produced, human, social, cultural, financial) capital (HDC) are necessary to create ecosystem services at many levels. HDC plays a role at three stages of ecosystem service delivery. Firstly, as essential elements of a combined social-ecological system to create a potential ecosystem service. Secondly, through the beneficiaries in shaping the demand for that service. Thirdly, in the form of additional capital required to realise the ecosystem service flow. We show that it is possible, although not always easy, to separately identify how these forms of capital contribute to ecosystem service flow. We discuss how applying a systems approach can help identify critical natural capital and critical human-derived capital to guide sustainable management of the stocks and flows of all forms of capital which underpin provision of multiple ecosystem services. The amount of realised ecosystem service can be managed in several ways: via the NC & HDC which govern the potential service, and via factors which govern both the demand from the beneficiaries, and the efficiency of use of the potential service by those beneficiaries.

KW - Nature capital

KW - Human capital

KW - Scale

KW - Sustainable

KW - Beneficiaries

KW - Potential Service

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 151

EP - 162

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -