Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmoti...
View graph of relations

Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmotically induced drought stress.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmotically induced drought stress. / Stikic, R.; Davies, William J.
In: Biologia Plantarum, Vol. 43, No. 3, 09.2000, p. 399-405.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Stikic R, Davies WJ. Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmotically induced drought stress. Biologia Plantarum. 2000 Sept;43(3):399-405. doi: 10.1023/A:1026798528481

Author

Stikic, R. ; Davies, William J. / Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmotically induced drought stress. In: Biologia Plantarum. 2000 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 399-405.

Bibtex

@article{d41dcf4993e248eea8b5f472371e9695,
title = "Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmotically induced drought stress.",
abstract = "Two maize lines differing in drought resistance were grown at different drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG 10 000) solutions with osmotic potentials of –0.20, –0.40 and –0.80 MPa in the semipermeable membrane system. During the five days soil water content decreased (from 0.43 to 0.29, 0.25 and 0.23 g cm–3 for three PEG solutions, respectively) as well as leaf water potentials (w; from – 0.54 to –0.76, –1.06 and –1.46 MPa). These values were not significantly different between the investigated lines, indicating that a controlled and consistent soil moisture stress was achieved. Soil drying induced an increase in the ABA content of leaves and xylem of both lines and the effects on stomatal conductance were greater in drought susceptible line (B-432) compared to drought resistant line (ZPBL-1304). To test possible difference in stomatal sensitivity to xylem ABA between lines and to assess any ABA vs. w interaction, roots were fed with 10, 50 and 100 mmol m–3 ABA solutions in another set of experiments. These results showed that manipulation of xylem ABA affected stomata of both lines similarly. Comparison of stomatal sensitivity to drought-induced and applied ABA demonstrated that drought treatment affected stomata of investigated lines by differentially increasing their sensitivity to xylem ABA, thus confirming an interaction between chemical signalling and hydraulic signalling.",
keywords = "abscisic acid - genotypic differences - PEG-10 000 - stomatal sensitivity - Zea mays L.",
author = "R. Stikic and Davies, {William J.}",
year = "2000",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1023/A:1026798528481",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "399--405",
journal = "Biologia Plantarum",
issn = "0006-3134",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stomatal reactions of two maize lines to osmotically induced drought stress.

AU - Stikic, R.

AU - Davies, William J.

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - Two maize lines differing in drought resistance were grown at different drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG 10 000) solutions with osmotic potentials of –0.20, –0.40 and –0.80 MPa in the semipermeable membrane system. During the five days soil water content decreased (from 0.43 to 0.29, 0.25 and 0.23 g cm–3 for three PEG solutions, respectively) as well as leaf water potentials (w; from – 0.54 to –0.76, –1.06 and –1.46 MPa). These values were not significantly different between the investigated lines, indicating that a controlled and consistent soil moisture stress was achieved. Soil drying induced an increase in the ABA content of leaves and xylem of both lines and the effects on stomatal conductance were greater in drought susceptible line (B-432) compared to drought resistant line (ZPBL-1304). To test possible difference in stomatal sensitivity to xylem ABA between lines and to assess any ABA vs. w interaction, roots were fed with 10, 50 and 100 mmol m–3 ABA solutions in another set of experiments. These results showed that manipulation of xylem ABA affected stomata of both lines similarly. Comparison of stomatal sensitivity to drought-induced and applied ABA demonstrated that drought treatment affected stomata of investigated lines by differentially increasing their sensitivity to xylem ABA, thus confirming an interaction between chemical signalling and hydraulic signalling.

AB - Two maize lines differing in drought resistance were grown at different drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG 10 000) solutions with osmotic potentials of –0.20, –0.40 and –0.80 MPa in the semipermeable membrane system. During the five days soil water content decreased (from 0.43 to 0.29, 0.25 and 0.23 g cm–3 for three PEG solutions, respectively) as well as leaf water potentials (w; from – 0.54 to –0.76, –1.06 and –1.46 MPa). These values were not significantly different between the investigated lines, indicating that a controlled and consistent soil moisture stress was achieved. Soil drying induced an increase in the ABA content of leaves and xylem of both lines and the effects on stomatal conductance were greater in drought susceptible line (B-432) compared to drought resistant line (ZPBL-1304). To test possible difference in stomatal sensitivity to xylem ABA between lines and to assess any ABA vs. w interaction, roots were fed with 10, 50 and 100 mmol m–3 ABA solutions in another set of experiments. These results showed that manipulation of xylem ABA affected stomata of both lines similarly. Comparison of stomatal sensitivity to drought-induced and applied ABA demonstrated that drought treatment affected stomata of investigated lines by differentially increasing their sensitivity to xylem ABA, thus confirming an interaction between chemical signalling and hydraulic signalling.

KW - abscisic acid - genotypic differences - PEG-10 000 - stomatal sensitivity - Zea mays L.

U2 - 10.1023/A:1026798528481

DO - 10.1023/A:1026798528481

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 399

EP - 405

JO - Biologia Plantarum

JF - Biologia Plantarum

SN - 0006-3134

IS - 3

ER -