Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Strategizing

Research

Associated organisational units

Keywords

View graph of relations

Strategizing: talk in action

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review

Published

Standard

Strategizing: talk in action. / Herepath, Andrea.
2015. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility, Athens, Greece.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review

Harvard

Herepath, A 2015, 'Strategizing: talk in action', Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility, Athens, Greece, 2/07/15 - 4/07/15.

APA

Herepath, A. (2015). Strategizing: talk in action. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility, Athens, Greece.

Vancouver

Herepath A. Strategizing: talk in action. 2015. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility, Athens, Greece.

Author

Herepath, Andrea. / Strategizing : talk in action. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility, Athens, Greece.

Bibtex

@conference{8d279b7861604cbe8f06026963f204bd,
title = "Strategizing: talk in action",
abstract = "This paper examines the discursive enactment of strategizing in a complex, multi-organizational, public sector strategic arena, sculpted by structural and cultural constraints, and the power games inherent to hegemonic contestation from the boardroom to the boundary of the organizational field. It combines Archerian critical realism with Fairclough{\textquoteright}s dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis to develop a more holistic understanding of the performative relationship between talk and action in strategizing. In doing so, it defines the semiotic scaffolding of the situational logic that manifests within the strategic arena, to reveal the role of discourse in the construction and mobilization of ensuing agency, and thus how stakeholders{\textquoteright} expectations are addressed—or discounted—in strategy formation. ",
keywords = "Archerian critical realism , dialectical-relational critical discourse analysis , power, strategizing , situational logic",
author = "Andrea Herepath",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
note = "31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility ; Conference date: 02-07-2015 Through 04-07-2015",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Strategizing

T2 - 31st EGOS Colloquium Organizations and the examined life: Reason, reflexivity and responsibility

AU - Herepath, Andrea

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper examines the discursive enactment of strategizing in a complex, multi-organizational, public sector strategic arena, sculpted by structural and cultural constraints, and the power games inherent to hegemonic contestation from the boardroom to the boundary of the organizational field. It combines Archerian critical realism with Fairclough’s dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis to develop a more holistic understanding of the performative relationship between talk and action in strategizing. In doing so, it defines the semiotic scaffolding of the situational logic that manifests within the strategic arena, to reveal the role of discourse in the construction and mobilization of ensuing agency, and thus how stakeholders’ expectations are addressed—or discounted—in strategy formation.

AB - This paper examines the discursive enactment of strategizing in a complex, multi-organizational, public sector strategic arena, sculpted by structural and cultural constraints, and the power games inherent to hegemonic contestation from the boardroom to the boundary of the organizational field. It combines Archerian critical realism with Fairclough’s dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis to develop a more holistic understanding of the performative relationship between talk and action in strategizing. In doing so, it defines the semiotic scaffolding of the situational logic that manifests within the strategic arena, to reveal the role of discourse in the construction and mobilization of ensuing agency, and thus how stakeholders’ expectations are addressed—or discounted—in strategy formation.

KW - Archerian critical realism

KW - dialectical-relational critical discourse analysis

KW - power

KW - strategizing

KW - situational logic

M3 - Conference paper

Y2 - 2 July 2015 through 4 July 2015

ER -