Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in adults with and without intellectual disability

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Published

Standard

Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in adults with and without intellectual disability. / McMahon, Martin; Hatton, Chris.
In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 63, No. 7, 31.07.2019, p. 796-797.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McMahon M, Hatton C. Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in adults with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2019 Jul 31;63(7):796-797. Epub 2019 Jun 27. doi: 10.1111/jir.12660

Author

McMahon, Martin ; Hatton, Chris. / Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in adults with and without intellectual disability. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2019 ; Vol. 63, No. 7. pp. 796-797.

Bibtex

@article{c6882ce486bf44edb66d9b47c5fa6c72,
title = "Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in adults with and without intellectual disability",
abstract = "Introduction:Subjective socioeconomic status (SSS), an individual{\textquoteright}sunderstanding of their socioeconomic position, is acknowledged in thegeneral population as a robust predictor of health over and aboveobjective socioeconomic indicators. This has not been investigated inadults with intellectual disability (ID).Methods:We administered afive-point self-rated health scale and theMacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status to a total population sampleof adults with ID (n=217), and to a random stratified sample of adultswithout ID (n =2,350). The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Statusis in a ladder format with ten rungs. It is an overall measure of SSS and isassociated with an individual{\textquoteright}s place in a societal hierarchy.Results:Eighty-two adults with ID responded independently. In bothgroups, a subjective assessment of one{\textquoteright}s ranking on the social hierarchywas correlated with more positive self-rated health - ID populationSpearmanr=0.35,p<0.001; general population Spearmanr=0.34,p<0.001. Further analyses will also be presented.Implications:This data indicates that higher levels of SSS areassociated with more positive self-rated health. Research in appropriately defined samples should use this measure to broaden the evidence baseand further determine if SSS is a robust correlate of health in the ID population.",
keywords = "Subjective socio-economic status, Self-rated health, Totalpopulation, Jersey",
author = "Martin McMahon and Chris Hatton",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/jir.12660",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "796--797",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in adults with and without intellectual disability

AU - McMahon, Martin

AU - Hatton, Chris

PY - 2019/7/31

Y1 - 2019/7/31

N2 - Introduction:Subjective socioeconomic status (SSS), an individual’sunderstanding of their socioeconomic position, is acknowledged in thegeneral population as a robust predictor of health over and aboveobjective socioeconomic indicators. This has not been investigated inadults with intellectual disability (ID).Methods:We administered afive-point self-rated health scale and theMacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status to a total population sampleof adults with ID (n=217), and to a random stratified sample of adultswithout ID (n =2,350). The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Statusis in a ladder format with ten rungs. It is an overall measure of SSS and isassociated with an individual’s place in a societal hierarchy.Results:Eighty-two adults with ID responded independently. In bothgroups, a subjective assessment of one’s ranking on the social hierarchywas correlated with more positive self-rated health - ID populationSpearmanr=0.35,p<0.001; general population Spearmanr=0.34,p<0.001. Further analyses will also be presented.Implications:This data indicates that higher levels of SSS areassociated with more positive self-rated health. Research in appropriately defined samples should use this measure to broaden the evidence baseand further determine if SSS is a robust correlate of health in the ID population.

AB - Introduction:Subjective socioeconomic status (SSS), an individual’sunderstanding of their socioeconomic position, is acknowledged in thegeneral population as a robust predictor of health over and aboveobjective socioeconomic indicators. This has not been investigated inadults with intellectual disability (ID).Methods:We administered afive-point self-rated health scale and theMacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status to a total population sampleof adults with ID (n=217), and to a random stratified sample of adultswithout ID (n =2,350). The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Statusis in a ladder format with ten rungs. It is an overall measure of SSS and isassociated with an individual’s place in a societal hierarchy.Results:Eighty-two adults with ID responded independently. In bothgroups, a subjective assessment of one’s ranking on the social hierarchywas correlated with more positive self-rated health - ID populationSpearmanr=0.35,p<0.001; general population Spearmanr=0.34,p<0.001. Further analyses will also be presented.Implications:This data indicates that higher levels of SSS areassociated with more positive self-rated health. Research in appropriately defined samples should use this measure to broaden the evidence baseand further determine if SSS is a robust correlate of health in the ID population.

KW - Subjective socio-economic status

KW - Self-rated health

KW - Totalpopulation

KW - Jersey

U2 - 10.1111/jir.12660

DO - 10.1111/jir.12660

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 63

SP - 796

EP - 797

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 7

ER -