Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Supply chain alignment as process

Electronic data

  • Accepted_PURE version_09.10.17

    Rights statement: This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Accepted author manuscript, 696 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Supply chain alignment as process: Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Supply chain alignment as process: Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance. / Selviaridis, Konstantinos; Spring, Martin.
In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, 05.03.2018, p. 732-755.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Selviaridis, K & Spring, M 2018, 'Supply chain alignment as process: Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 732-755. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2017-0059

APA

Vancouver

Selviaridis K, Spring M. Supply chain alignment as process: Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2018 Mar 5;38(3):732-755. Epub 2018 Feb 21. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2017-0059

Author

Selviaridis, Konstantinos ; Spring, Martin. / Supply chain alignment as process : Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance. In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 732-755.

Bibtex

@article{a5086dd27ceb4942bf65797eeec3e966,
title = "Supply chain alignment as process: Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand how buyers and suppliers in supply chains learn to align their performance objectives and incentives through contracting.Design/methodology/approachTwo longitudinal case studies of the process of supply chain alignment were conducted based on 26 semi-structured interviews and 25 key documents including drafts of contracts and service level agreements.FindingsThe dynamic interplay of contracting and learning contributes to supply chain alignment. Exchange-, partner- and contract framing-specific learning that accumulates during the contracting process is used to (re)design pay-for-performance provisions. Such learning also results in improved buyer-supplier relationships that enable alignment, complementing the effect of contractual incentives.Research limitations/implicationsThe study demonstrates that the interplay of contracting and learning is an important means of achieving supply chain alignment. Supply chain alignment is seen as a process, rather than as a state. It does not happen automatically or instantaneously, nor is it unidirectional. Rather, it is a discontinuous process triggered by episodic events that requires interactive work and learning.Practical implicationsDevelopment of performance contracting capabilities entails learning how to refine performance incentives and their framing to trigger positive responses from supply chain counterparts.Originality/valueThe paper addresses supply chain alignment as a process. Accordingly, it stresses some important features of supply chain alignment.",
keywords = "Learning, Pay-for-performance, Inter-organizational relationships, Contracting, Supply chain alignment",
author = "Konstantinos Selviaridis and Martin Spring",
note = "This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1108/IJOPM-01-2017-0059",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "732--755",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supply chain alignment as process

T2 - Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance

AU - Selviaridis, Konstantinos

AU - Spring, Martin

N1 - This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

PY - 2018/3/5

Y1 - 2018/3/5

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand how buyers and suppliers in supply chains learn to align their performance objectives and incentives through contracting.Design/methodology/approachTwo longitudinal case studies of the process of supply chain alignment were conducted based on 26 semi-structured interviews and 25 key documents including drafts of contracts and service level agreements.FindingsThe dynamic interplay of contracting and learning contributes to supply chain alignment. Exchange-, partner- and contract framing-specific learning that accumulates during the contracting process is used to (re)design pay-for-performance provisions. Such learning also results in improved buyer-supplier relationships that enable alignment, complementing the effect of contractual incentives.Research limitations/implicationsThe study demonstrates that the interplay of contracting and learning is an important means of achieving supply chain alignment. Supply chain alignment is seen as a process, rather than as a state. It does not happen automatically or instantaneously, nor is it unidirectional. Rather, it is a discontinuous process triggered by episodic events that requires interactive work and learning.Practical implicationsDevelopment of performance contracting capabilities entails learning how to refine performance incentives and their framing to trigger positive responses from supply chain counterparts.Originality/valueThe paper addresses supply chain alignment as a process. Accordingly, it stresses some important features of supply chain alignment.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand how buyers and suppliers in supply chains learn to align their performance objectives and incentives through contracting.Design/methodology/approachTwo longitudinal case studies of the process of supply chain alignment were conducted based on 26 semi-structured interviews and 25 key documents including drafts of contracts and service level agreements.FindingsThe dynamic interplay of contracting and learning contributes to supply chain alignment. Exchange-, partner- and contract framing-specific learning that accumulates during the contracting process is used to (re)design pay-for-performance provisions. Such learning also results in improved buyer-supplier relationships that enable alignment, complementing the effect of contractual incentives.Research limitations/implicationsThe study demonstrates that the interplay of contracting and learning is an important means of achieving supply chain alignment. Supply chain alignment is seen as a process, rather than as a state. It does not happen automatically or instantaneously, nor is it unidirectional. Rather, it is a discontinuous process triggered by episodic events that requires interactive work and learning.Practical implicationsDevelopment of performance contracting capabilities entails learning how to refine performance incentives and their framing to trigger positive responses from supply chain counterparts.Originality/valueThe paper addresses supply chain alignment as a process. Accordingly, it stresses some important features of supply chain alignment.

KW - Learning

KW - Pay-for-performance

KW - Inter-organizational relationships

KW - Contracting

KW - Supply chain alignment

U2 - 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2017-0059

DO - 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2017-0059

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 732

EP - 755

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 3

ER -