Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sustainable Procurement

Electronic data

  • Sayed_et_al_Jan_2020_Sustainable_Procurement_Final_Accepted_Manuscript_including_tabes_and_figures

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Production Planning & Control on 24 Jan 2020, available online:  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09537287.2020.1717661

    Accepted author manuscript, 693 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 24/01/21

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sustainable Procurement: Comparing In-House and Outsourcing Implementation Modes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Sustainable Procurement : Comparing In-House and Outsourcing Implementation Modes. / Sayed, Maysara; Hendry, Linda; Bell, Marta.

In: Production Planning and Control, 24.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{3f7069153af44b61abab0922eb207ecd,
title = "Sustainable Procurement: Comparing In-House and Outsourcing Implementation Modes",
abstract = "Sustainable supply chain management practices can be particularly difficult to implement when the responsibility for sustainable procurement (SP) rests with buyers employed by a contractor, rather than an in-house procurement team. Yet there is no extant research that investigates the effect of outsourcing on SP. To address this research gap, this paper uses multi-case study data to explore the impact of outsourcing versus in-house implementation modes in the pursuit of SP. The findings suggest that each implementation mode has distinctive challenges and facilitators. However, by considering Transaction Cost Economics, results reveal that the advantage of outsourcing to professionals, with well-established SP expertise, brings information asymmetries in developing initial outsourcing contracts, which can lead to poorer sustainability performance than initially expected. Furthermore, when applying Principal Agency Theory, results suggest that sustainable performance can be improved in the long term through the effective design of well-constructed contractual relationships as SP maturity increases. ",
keywords = "Sustainability, procurement, Outsourcing, Higher Education, Food & Catering",
author = "Maysara Sayed and Linda Hendry and Marta Bell",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/09537287.2020.1717661",
language = "English",
journal = "Production Planning and Control",
issn = "0953-7287",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable Procurement

T2 - Comparing In-House and Outsourcing Implementation Modes

AU - Sayed, Maysara

AU - Hendry, Linda

AU - Bell, Marta

PY - 2020/1/24

Y1 - 2020/1/24

N2 - Sustainable supply chain management practices can be particularly difficult to implement when the responsibility for sustainable procurement (SP) rests with buyers employed by a contractor, rather than an in-house procurement team. Yet there is no extant research that investigates the effect of outsourcing on SP. To address this research gap, this paper uses multi-case study data to explore the impact of outsourcing versus in-house implementation modes in the pursuit of SP. The findings suggest that each implementation mode has distinctive challenges and facilitators. However, by considering Transaction Cost Economics, results reveal that the advantage of outsourcing to professionals, with well-established SP expertise, brings information asymmetries in developing initial outsourcing contracts, which can lead to poorer sustainability performance than initially expected. Furthermore, when applying Principal Agency Theory, results suggest that sustainable performance can be improved in the long term through the effective design of well-constructed contractual relationships as SP maturity increases.

AB - Sustainable supply chain management practices can be particularly difficult to implement when the responsibility for sustainable procurement (SP) rests with buyers employed by a contractor, rather than an in-house procurement team. Yet there is no extant research that investigates the effect of outsourcing on SP. To address this research gap, this paper uses multi-case study data to explore the impact of outsourcing versus in-house implementation modes in the pursuit of SP. The findings suggest that each implementation mode has distinctive challenges and facilitators. However, by considering Transaction Cost Economics, results reveal that the advantage of outsourcing to professionals, with well-established SP expertise, brings information asymmetries in developing initial outsourcing contracts, which can lead to poorer sustainability performance than initially expected. Furthermore, when applying Principal Agency Theory, results suggest that sustainable performance can be improved in the long term through the effective design of well-constructed contractual relationships as SP maturity increases.

KW - Sustainability

KW - procurement

KW - Outsourcing

KW - Higher Education

KW - Food & Catering

U2 - 10.1080/09537287.2020.1717661

DO - 10.1080/09537287.2020.1717661

M3 - Journal article

JO - Production Planning and Control

JF - Production Planning and Control

SN - 0953-7287

ER -