Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the...
View graph of relations

Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative. / Stafford, Mai; Nazroo, James; Popay, Jennie et al.
In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 62, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 298-304.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Stafford, M, Nazroo, J, Popay, J & Whitehead, M 2008, 'Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.058628

APA

Stafford, M., Nazroo, J., Popay, J., & Whitehead, M. (2008). Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(4), 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.058628

Vancouver

Stafford M, Nazroo J, Popay J, Whitehead M. Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2008 Apr;62(4):298-304. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.058628

Author

Stafford, Mai ; Nazroo, James ; Popay, Jennie et al. / Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative. In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2008 ; Vol. 62, No. 4. pp. 298-304.

Bibtex

@article{8a9e9e2d96184ca3be8b23e1b3e53d72,
title = "Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative",
abstract = "Objective: To assess health improvement and differential changes in health across various sociodemographic groups in neighbourhood renewal areas.Design and setting: A longitudinal survey of 10 390 residents in New Deal for Communities (NDC) areas and 977 residents in comparator areas in England.Measures and methods: Changes on several outcomes across five domains (health, unemployment, education, crime and the physical environment) were assessed by sex, age, educational and ethnic group.Results: Small overall improvements were seen on all domains in NDC areas but similar improvements were also seen in comparator areas. In NDC areas, higher educational groups were more likely to stop smoking, less likely to develop a limiting long-term illness, more likely to find employment and more likely to participate in education or training (p for trend <0.05). Older people and women were less likely to find employment and experienced smaller increases in income. These patterns were generally mirrored in comparator areas, although the education gradient in participation in education or training was less steep in NDC areas.Conclusions: Evidence from two-year follow-up does not support an NDC effect, either overall or for particular population groups. Residents with lower education experienced the least favourable health profiles at baseline and the smallest improvements. Programme leaders should consider how to encourage participation among those with the lowest education. A shallower social gradient in participation in education and training in NDC areas and a lack of gradient in income, crime and environmental outcomes indicate that some aspects of the programme may be reaching all sections of the community.",
author = "Mai Stafford and James Nazroo and Jennie Popay and Margaret Whitehead",
year = "2008",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1136/jech.2006.058628",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "298--304",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health",
issn = "0143-005X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities Initiative

AU - Stafford, Mai

AU - Nazroo, James

AU - Popay, Jennie

AU - Whitehead, Margaret

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objective: To assess health improvement and differential changes in health across various sociodemographic groups in neighbourhood renewal areas.Design and setting: A longitudinal survey of 10 390 residents in New Deal for Communities (NDC) areas and 977 residents in comparator areas in England.Measures and methods: Changes on several outcomes across five domains (health, unemployment, education, crime and the physical environment) were assessed by sex, age, educational and ethnic group.Results: Small overall improvements were seen on all domains in NDC areas but similar improvements were also seen in comparator areas. In NDC areas, higher educational groups were more likely to stop smoking, less likely to develop a limiting long-term illness, more likely to find employment and more likely to participate in education or training (p for trend <0.05). Older people and women were less likely to find employment and experienced smaller increases in income. These patterns were generally mirrored in comparator areas, although the education gradient in participation in education or training was less steep in NDC areas.Conclusions: Evidence from two-year follow-up does not support an NDC effect, either overall or for particular population groups. Residents with lower education experienced the least favourable health profiles at baseline and the smallest improvements. Programme leaders should consider how to encourage participation among those with the lowest education. A shallower social gradient in participation in education and training in NDC areas and a lack of gradient in income, crime and environmental outcomes indicate that some aspects of the programme may be reaching all sections of the community.

AB - Objective: To assess health improvement and differential changes in health across various sociodemographic groups in neighbourhood renewal areas.Design and setting: A longitudinal survey of 10 390 residents in New Deal for Communities (NDC) areas and 977 residents in comparator areas in England.Measures and methods: Changes on several outcomes across five domains (health, unemployment, education, crime and the physical environment) were assessed by sex, age, educational and ethnic group.Results: Small overall improvements were seen on all domains in NDC areas but similar improvements were also seen in comparator areas. In NDC areas, higher educational groups were more likely to stop smoking, less likely to develop a limiting long-term illness, more likely to find employment and more likely to participate in education or training (p for trend <0.05). Older people and women were less likely to find employment and experienced smaller increases in income. These patterns were generally mirrored in comparator areas, although the education gradient in participation in education or training was less steep in NDC areas.Conclusions: Evidence from two-year follow-up does not support an NDC effect, either overall or for particular population groups. Residents with lower education experienced the least favourable health profiles at baseline and the smallest improvements. Programme leaders should consider how to encourage participation among those with the lowest education. A shallower social gradient in participation in education and training in NDC areas and a lack of gradient in income, crime and environmental outcomes indicate that some aspects of the programme may be reaching all sections of the community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149113390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jech.2006.058628

DO - 10.1136/jech.2006.058628

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:41149113390

VL - 62

SP - 298

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 4

ER -