12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Temperature measured at the axilla compared wit...
View graph of relations

« Back

Temperature measured at the axilla compared with rectum in children and young people: systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date29/04/2000
JournalBMJ (British Medical Journal)
Journal number7243
Volume320
Number of pages5
Pages1174-1178
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the agreement between temperature measured at the axilla and rectum in children and young people

Design: A systematic review of studies comparing temperature measured at the axilla (test site) with temperature measured at the rectum (reference site) using the same type of measuring device at both sites in each patient. Devices were mercury or electronic thermometers or indwelling thermocouple probes.

Studies reviewed: 40 studies including 5528 children and young people from birth to 18 years.

Data extraction: Difference in temperature readings at the axilla and rectum.

Results: 20 studies (n=3201 (58%) participants) had sufficient data to be included in a meta-analysis. There was significant residual heterogeneity in both mean differences and sample standard deviations within the groups using different devices and within age groups. The pooled (random effects) mean temperature difference (rectal minus axillary temperature) for mercury thermometers was 0.25°C (95% limits of agreement −0.15°C to 0.65°C) and for electronic thermometers was 0.85°C (−0.19°C to 1.90°C). The pooled (random effects) mean temperature difference (rectal minus axillary temperature) for neonates was 0.17°C (−0.15°C to 0.50°C) and for older children and young people was 0.92°C (−0.15°C to 1.98°C).

Conclusions: The difference between temperature readings at the axilla and rectum using either mercury or electronic thermometers showed wide variation across studies. This has implications for clinical situations where temperature needs to be measured with precision