Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The basis of Stroop interference involving the ...
View graph of relations

The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch. / Walker, Peter; Smith, S.
In: Perception, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1986, p. 491-496.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Walker P, Smith S. The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch. Perception. 1986;15(4):491-496. doi: 10.1068/p150491

Author

Walker, Peter ; Smith, S. / The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch. In: Perception. 1986 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 491-496.

Bibtex

@article{2b14fe80fa0044389f29c9f1a758dafc,
title = "The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch.",
abstract = "A pure auditory tone has a range of multimodal qualities that are determined by its pitch. A reaction-time task was used to demonstrate that subjects respond immediately and automatically to these qualities. Subjects were required to press one of two keys depending on which word, from a limited set, appeared on a microcomputer screen. The words were antonyms that represented multimodal stimulus qualities, and they were assigned to alternative responses so that the two words that shared the same response were correlated in the same way with pitch. As an incidental stimulus, either a 50 Hz tone or a 5500 Hz tone accompanied the presentation of each word. Subjects were found to respond more slowly when the multimodal qualities of the tone were incongruent with the qualities represented by the test word. When the stimulus-response mapping rules were changed, however, the Stroop effect did not occur; suggesting that a polarised semantic code of the incidental tone, that embraces its multimodal features, accesses the same semantic register as the equivalent code for the test word itself.",
author = "Peter Walker and S. Smith",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1068/p150491",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "491--496",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch.

AU - Walker, Peter

AU - Smith, S.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - A pure auditory tone has a range of multimodal qualities that are determined by its pitch. A reaction-time task was used to demonstrate that subjects respond immediately and automatically to these qualities. Subjects were required to press one of two keys depending on which word, from a limited set, appeared on a microcomputer screen. The words were antonyms that represented multimodal stimulus qualities, and they were assigned to alternative responses so that the two words that shared the same response were correlated in the same way with pitch. As an incidental stimulus, either a 50 Hz tone or a 5500 Hz tone accompanied the presentation of each word. Subjects were found to respond more slowly when the multimodal qualities of the tone were incongruent with the qualities represented by the test word. When the stimulus-response mapping rules were changed, however, the Stroop effect did not occur; suggesting that a polarised semantic code of the incidental tone, that embraces its multimodal features, accesses the same semantic register as the equivalent code for the test word itself.

AB - A pure auditory tone has a range of multimodal qualities that are determined by its pitch. A reaction-time task was used to demonstrate that subjects respond immediately and automatically to these qualities. Subjects were required to press one of two keys depending on which word, from a limited set, appeared on a microcomputer screen. The words were antonyms that represented multimodal stimulus qualities, and they were assigned to alternative responses so that the two words that shared the same response were correlated in the same way with pitch. As an incidental stimulus, either a 50 Hz tone or a 5500 Hz tone accompanied the presentation of each word. Subjects were found to respond more slowly when the multimodal qualities of the tone were incongruent with the qualities represented by the test word. When the stimulus-response mapping rules were changed, however, the Stroop effect did not occur; suggesting that a polarised semantic code of the incidental tone, that embraces its multimodal features, accesses the same semantic register as the equivalent code for the test word itself.

U2 - 10.1068/p150491

DO - 10.1068/p150491

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 491

EP - 496

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 4

ER -