Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic f...

Electronic data

  • Kontogianni_et_al._SGC_Timeline_19.3.18_accepted_version

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7, 3, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

    Accepted author manuscript, 529 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. / Kontogianni, Feni; Hope, Lorraine; Vrij, Aldert; Taylor, Paul Jonathon; Gabbert, Fiona.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 7, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 454-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

Kontogianni, F, Hope, L, Vrij, A, Taylor, PJ & Gabbert, F 2018, 'The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing', Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 454-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

APA

Kontogianni, F., Hope, L., Vrij, A., Taylor, P. J., & Gabbert, F. (2018). The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 454-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

Vancouver

Kontogianni F, Hope L, Vrij A, Taylor PJ, Gabbert F. The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2018 Sep;7(3):454-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

Author

Kontogianni, Feni ; Hope, Lorraine ; Vrij, Aldert ; Taylor, Paul Jonathon ; Gabbert, Fiona. / The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2018 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 454-461.

Bibtex

@article{ae4c654b56844e3884398cbcc6f4a3fd,
title = "The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing",
abstract = "Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events underchallenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research,participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attentionusing a timeline reporting format. Extending the Timeline Technique to assess the relativeperformance of two additional mnemonics, Self-Generated Cues (SGC) and Other-GeneratedCues (OGC), participants provided an account across three Timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and No Cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or No Cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.",
keywords = "Information gathering, Timeline, Cognitive mnemonics, Self-Generated Cues, Memory retrieval, Divided attention",
author = "Feni Kontogianni and Lorraine Hope and Aldert Vrij and Taylor, {Paul Jonathon} and Fiona Gabbert",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7, 3, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006",
year = "2018",
month = sep
doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "454--461",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",
issn = "2211-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing

AU - Kontogianni, Feni

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Vrij, Aldert

AU - Taylor, Paul Jonathon

AU - Gabbert, Fiona

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7, 3, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events underchallenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research,participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attentionusing a timeline reporting format. Extending the Timeline Technique to assess the relativeperformance of two additional mnemonics, Self-Generated Cues (SGC) and Other-GeneratedCues (OGC), participants provided an account across three Timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and No Cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or No Cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.

AB - Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events underchallenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research,participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attentionusing a timeline reporting format. Extending the Timeline Technique to assess the relativeperformance of two additional mnemonics, Self-Generated Cues (SGC) and Other-GeneratedCues (OGC), participants provided an account across three Timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and No Cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or No Cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.

KW - Information gathering

KW - Timeline

KW - Cognitive mnemonics

KW - Self-Generated Cues

KW - Memory retrieval

KW - Divided attention

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 454

EP - 461

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

SN - 2211-3681

IS - 3

ER -