Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The BRICS and global governance

Research

Electronic data

  • 2017_12_14_final

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Third World Quarterly on 19/03/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

    Accepted author manuscript, 604 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The BRICS and global governance: China’s contradictory role

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The BRICS and global governance: China’s contradictory role. / Beeson, Mark; Zeng, Jinghan.
In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2018, p. 1962-1978.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Beeson, M & Zeng, J 2018, 'The BRICS and global governance: China’s contradictory role', Third World Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1962-1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

APA

Beeson, M., & Zeng, J. (2018). The BRICS and global governance: China’s contradictory role. Third World Quarterly, 39(10), 1962-1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

Vancouver

Beeson M, Zeng J. The BRICS and global governance: China’s contradictory role. Third World Quarterly. 2018;39(10):1962-1978. Epub 2018 Mar 19. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

Author

Beeson, Mark ; Zeng, Jinghan. / The BRICS and global governance : China’s contradictory role. In: Third World Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 10. pp. 1962-1978.

Bibtex

@article{8570673ed1004fcea2a9e88dfef0576a,
title = "The BRICS and global governance: China{\textquoteright}s contradictory role",
abstract = "The impact of rising powers generally and the BRICS - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - in particular on the existing global order has become controversial and contested. Donald Trump{\textquoteright}s nationalist foreign policy agenda has raised questions about the BRICS willingness and capacity to provide leadership in place on an American administration that is increasingly inward looking. As a result, the rise of BRICS poses potential normative and structural challenges to the existing liberal international order. Given its geoeconomic significance, China also poses a potential problem for the other BRICS, as well as the governance of the existing order more generally. Consequently, we argue that it will be difficult for the BRICS to maintain a unified position amongst themselves, let alone play a constructive role in preserving the foundations of {\textquoteleft}global governance{\textquoteright}.",
author = "Mark Beeson and Jinghan Zeng",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Third World Quarterly on 19/03/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1962--1978",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The BRICS and global governance

T2 - China’s contradictory role

AU - Beeson, Mark

AU - Zeng, Jinghan

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Third World Quarterly on 19/03/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The impact of rising powers generally and the BRICS - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - in particular on the existing global order has become controversial and contested. Donald Trump’s nationalist foreign policy agenda has raised questions about the BRICS willingness and capacity to provide leadership in place on an American administration that is increasingly inward looking. As a result, the rise of BRICS poses potential normative and structural challenges to the existing liberal international order. Given its geoeconomic significance, China also poses a potential problem for the other BRICS, as well as the governance of the existing order more generally. Consequently, we argue that it will be difficult for the BRICS to maintain a unified position amongst themselves, let alone play a constructive role in preserving the foundations of ‘global governance’.

AB - The impact of rising powers generally and the BRICS - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - in particular on the existing global order has become controversial and contested. Donald Trump’s nationalist foreign policy agenda has raised questions about the BRICS willingness and capacity to provide leadership in place on an American administration that is increasingly inward looking. As a result, the rise of BRICS poses potential normative and structural challenges to the existing liberal international order. Given its geoeconomic significance, China also poses a potential problem for the other BRICS, as well as the governance of the existing order more generally. Consequently, we argue that it will be difficult for the BRICS to maintain a unified position amongst themselves, let alone play a constructive role in preserving the foundations of ‘global governance’.

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 1962

EP - 1978

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 10

ER -