Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The business case for regulation of corporate s...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The business case for regulation of corporate social responsibility and accountability

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The business case for regulation of corporate social responsibility and accountability. / Unerman, J.; O'Dwyer, Brendan.

In: Accounting Forum, Vol. 31, No. 4, 12.2007, p. 332-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Unerman, J. ; O'Dwyer, Brendan. / The business case for regulation of corporate social responsibility and accountability. In: Accounting Forum. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 332-353.

Bibtex

@article{5373b5ad99f349718992bb274e5409b0,
title = "The business case for regulation of corporate social responsibility and accountability",
abstract = "This paper develops an alternative (or supplementary) theoretical justification for the regulation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social and environmental accounting and reporting (SEAR) to the justification contained in the extant academic literature. It does this by demonstrating how, contrary to the dominant business discourse, increased regulation designed to protect the social and environmental interests of a range of stakeholders can also serve to enhance corporate economic performance and shareholder value. The theoretical perspectives developed in this paper are drawn from Beck's and Giddens' theories on reflexive modernity, and indicate that reflexively appropriated knowledge can be a key factor in developing socially constructed understandings of the social and environmental risks to a range of stakeholders inherent in business operations. In situations where voluntary self-regulation of CSR and SEAR has been ineffective in preventing corporate actions and decisions that have resulted in damaging social and environmental consequences, processes of reflexivity can substantially increase public awareness of the level of risk they face from corporate operations. Such increased perceptions of risk can lead to a loss of trust in an individual corporation or a whole industrial sector, and this can be exacerbated where stakeholders begin to actively seek out alternative risk discourses to inform themselves about possible risks of which they were previously unaware. We argue that effective statutory regulation could avoid these outcomes, and the loss of shareholder economic value that can flow from these outcomes. {\textcopyright} 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Beck, Business case for CSR, Giddens, Reflexive modernity, Regulation, Risk, Shareholder value, Trust",
author = "J. Unerman and Brendan O'Dwyer",
year = "2007",
month = dec
doi = "10.1016/j.accfor.2007.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "332--353",
journal = "Accounting Forum",
issn = "0155-9982",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The business case for regulation of corporate social responsibility and accountability

AU - Unerman, J.

AU - O'Dwyer, Brendan

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - This paper develops an alternative (or supplementary) theoretical justification for the regulation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social and environmental accounting and reporting (SEAR) to the justification contained in the extant academic literature. It does this by demonstrating how, contrary to the dominant business discourse, increased regulation designed to protect the social and environmental interests of a range of stakeholders can also serve to enhance corporate economic performance and shareholder value. The theoretical perspectives developed in this paper are drawn from Beck's and Giddens' theories on reflexive modernity, and indicate that reflexively appropriated knowledge can be a key factor in developing socially constructed understandings of the social and environmental risks to a range of stakeholders inherent in business operations. In situations where voluntary self-regulation of CSR and SEAR has been ineffective in preventing corporate actions and decisions that have resulted in damaging social and environmental consequences, processes of reflexivity can substantially increase public awareness of the level of risk they face from corporate operations. Such increased perceptions of risk can lead to a loss of trust in an individual corporation or a whole industrial sector, and this can be exacerbated where stakeholders begin to actively seek out alternative risk discourses to inform themselves about possible risks of which they were previously unaware. We argue that effective statutory regulation could avoid these outcomes, and the loss of shareholder economic value that can flow from these outcomes. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This paper develops an alternative (or supplementary) theoretical justification for the regulation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social and environmental accounting and reporting (SEAR) to the justification contained in the extant academic literature. It does this by demonstrating how, contrary to the dominant business discourse, increased regulation designed to protect the social and environmental interests of a range of stakeholders can also serve to enhance corporate economic performance and shareholder value. The theoretical perspectives developed in this paper are drawn from Beck's and Giddens' theories on reflexive modernity, and indicate that reflexively appropriated knowledge can be a key factor in developing socially constructed understandings of the social and environmental risks to a range of stakeholders inherent in business operations. In situations where voluntary self-regulation of CSR and SEAR has been ineffective in preventing corporate actions and decisions that have resulted in damaging social and environmental consequences, processes of reflexivity can substantially increase public awareness of the level of risk they face from corporate operations. Such increased perceptions of risk can lead to a loss of trust in an individual corporation or a whole industrial sector, and this can be exacerbated where stakeholders begin to actively seek out alternative risk discourses to inform themselves about possible risks of which they were previously unaware. We argue that effective statutory regulation could avoid these outcomes, and the loss of shareholder economic value that can flow from these outcomes. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Beck

KW - Business case for CSR

KW - Giddens

KW - Reflexive modernity

KW - Regulation

KW - Risk

KW - Shareholder value

KW - Trust

U2 - 10.1016/j.accfor.2007.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.accfor.2007.08.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 332

EP - 353

JO - Accounting Forum

JF - Accounting Forum

SN - 0155-9982

IS - 4

ER -