Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedba...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers. / Decorte, Tom; Malm, Aili; Sznitman, Sharon et al.
In: Methodological Innovations, Vol. 12, No. 1, 28.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Decorte, T, Malm, A, Sznitman, S, Hakkarainen, P, Barratt, M, Potter, GR, Werse, B, Kamphausen, G, Lenton, S & Frank, VA 2019, 'The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers', Methodological Innovations, vol. 12, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119825606

APA

Decorte, T., Malm, A., Sznitman, S., Hakkarainen, P., Barratt, M., Potter, G. R., Werse, B., Kamphausen, G., Lenton, S., & Frank, V. A. (2019). The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers. Methodological Innovations, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119825606

Vancouver

Decorte T, Malm A, Sznitman S, Hakkarainen P, Barratt M, Potter GR et al. The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers. Methodological Innovations. 2019 Feb 28;12(1). Epub 2019 Feb 11. doi: 10.1177/2059799119825606

Author

Decorte, Tom ; Malm, Aili ; Sznitman, Sharon et al. / The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys : Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers. In: Methodological Innovations. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{ff8d2da2809a41f6bdf38c389ffa1c4c,
title = "The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers",
abstract = "It is common practice in survey questionnaires to include a general open and non-directive feedback question at the end, but the analysis of this type of data is rarely discussed in the methodological literature. While these open-ended comments can be useful, most researchers fail to report on this issue. The aim of this article is to illustrate and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of analyzing responses to open-ended feedback questions. The article describes the experiences of coding and analyzing data generated through a feedback question at the end of an international online survey with small-scale cannabis cultivators carried out by the Global Cannabis Cultivation Research Consortium. After describing the design and dataset of the web survey, the analytical approach and coding frame are presented. The analytical strategies chosen in this study illustrate the diversity and complexity of feedback comments which pose methodological challenges to researchers wishing to use them for data analyses. In this article, three types of feedback comments (political/policy comments, general comments of positive and negative appreciation, and methodological comments) are used to illustrate the difficulties and advantages of analyzing this type of data. The advantages of analyzing feedback comments are well known, but they seem to be rarely exploited. General feedback questions at the end of surveys are typically non-directive. If researchers want to use these data for research and analyses, they need a clear strategy. They ought to give enough thought to why they are including this type of question, and develop an analytical strategy at the design stage of the study.",
keywords = "Survey questionnaires, feedback comments, data analysis, coding frame, web survey, cannabis growers",
author = "Tom Decorte and Aili Malm and Sharon Sznitman and Pekka Hakkarainen and Monica Barratt and Potter, {Gary Richard} and Bernd Werse and Gerrit Kamphausen and Simon Lenton and Frank, {Vibeke Asmussen}",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1177/2059799119825606",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Methodological Innovations",
issn = "2059-7991",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys

T2 - Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small scale cannabis growers

AU - Decorte, Tom

AU - Malm, Aili

AU - Sznitman, Sharon

AU - Hakkarainen, Pekka

AU - Barratt, Monica

AU - Potter, Gary Richard

AU - Werse, Bernd

AU - Kamphausen, Gerrit

AU - Lenton, Simon

AU - Frank, Vibeke Asmussen

PY - 2019/2/28

Y1 - 2019/2/28

N2 - It is common practice in survey questionnaires to include a general open and non-directive feedback question at the end, but the analysis of this type of data is rarely discussed in the methodological literature. While these open-ended comments can be useful, most researchers fail to report on this issue. The aim of this article is to illustrate and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of analyzing responses to open-ended feedback questions. The article describes the experiences of coding and analyzing data generated through a feedback question at the end of an international online survey with small-scale cannabis cultivators carried out by the Global Cannabis Cultivation Research Consortium. After describing the design and dataset of the web survey, the analytical approach and coding frame are presented. The analytical strategies chosen in this study illustrate the diversity and complexity of feedback comments which pose methodological challenges to researchers wishing to use them for data analyses. In this article, three types of feedback comments (political/policy comments, general comments of positive and negative appreciation, and methodological comments) are used to illustrate the difficulties and advantages of analyzing this type of data. The advantages of analyzing feedback comments are well known, but they seem to be rarely exploited. General feedback questions at the end of surveys are typically non-directive. If researchers want to use these data for research and analyses, they need a clear strategy. They ought to give enough thought to why they are including this type of question, and develop an analytical strategy at the design stage of the study.

AB - It is common practice in survey questionnaires to include a general open and non-directive feedback question at the end, but the analysis of this type of data is rarely discussed in the methodological literature. While these open-ended comments can be useful, most researchers fail to report on this issue. The aim of this article is to illustrate and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of analyzing responses to open-ended feedback questions. The article describes the experiences of coding and analyzing data generated through a feedback question at the end of an international online survey with small-scale cannabis cultivators carried out by the Global Cannabis Cultivation Research Consortium. After describing the design and dataset of the web survey, the analytical approach and coding frame are presented. The analytical strategies chosen in this study illustrate the diversity and complexity of feedback comments which pose methodological challenges to researchers wishing to use them for data analyses. In this article, three types of feedback comments (political/policy comments, general comments of positive and negative appreciation, and methodological comments) are used to illustrate the difficulties and advantages of analyzing this type of data. The advantages of analyzing feedback comments are well known, but they seem to be rarely exploited. General feedback questions at the end of surveys are typically non-directive. If researchers want to use these data for research and analyses, they need a clear strategy. They ought to give enough thought to why they are including this type of question, and develop an analytical strategy at the design stage of the study.

KW - Survey questionnaires

KW - feedback comments

KW - data analysis

KW - coding frame

KW - web survey

KW - cannabis growers

U2 - 10.1177/2059799119825606

DO - 10.1177/2059799119825606

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

JO - Methodological Innovations

JF - Methodological Innovations

SN - 2059-7991

IS - 1

ER -