Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The criminalisation of symbols of the past

Electronic data

  • -IJC-IJC10_03-S1744552314000135a

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=IJC The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Journal of Law in Context, 10 (3), pp 295-314 2014, © 2014 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 396 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The criminalisation of symbols of the past: expression, law and memory

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The criminalisation of symbols of the past : expression, law and memory. / Fijalkowski, Agata.

In: International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 10, No. 3, 05.09.2014, p. 295-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Fijalkowski, Agata. / The criminalisation of symbols of the past : expression, law and memory. In: International Journal of Law in Context. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 295-314.

Bibtex

@article{7c22c2320e99495c97aad026acbf6835,
title = "The criminalisation of symbols of the past: expression, law and memory",
abstract = "This article examines the criminalisation of symbols of the past. It considers the 2011 judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In this compact and well-ordered decision, the Tribunal, with reference to key European examples, critically assesses the constitutionality of criminal law provisions that prohibit the dissemination and public use of symbols of the past that pertained to fascist, Communist, or other totalitarian content. This article considers the Tribunal’s ruling within three important contexts: firstly, the European, where the concept of totalitarian crimes has become a European question and subject of European human rights, namely the freedom of expression; secondly, post-dictatorial Europe, where specific states have addressed the use of totalitarian symbols in their respective criminal laws; and finally, transitional justice, where the criminalisation of symbols of the past has attained a central and permanent feature in European narratives about justice. Significantly, these cases reveal the temporal element of transitional justice. This article discusses the two case studies of most relevance to Poland, namely that of Germany and Hungary. Reference is also made to the Baltic States, where there has been a concerted effort, together with Poland, to bring the notion of totalitarian crimes and histories to the attention of Europe. The article concurs that the cases concerning the use of symbols is an excellent illustration of where memory and law intersect. Using historical, comparative and contextual methodologies the paper demonstrates the legal philosophical complexities of the crime, political realities, and key dimensions of transitional justice and its relationship to expression, law and memory.",
keywords = "totalitarian symbols, Communism, European human rights, transitional justice, Polish Constitutional Tribunal, Hungarian Constitutional Court",
author = "Agata Fijalkowski",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=IJC The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Journal of Law in Context, 10 (3), pp 295-314 2014, {\circledC} 2014 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S1744552314000135",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "295--314",
journal = "International Journal of Law in Context",
issn = "1744-5523",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The criminalisation of symbols of the past

T2 - expression, law and memory

AU - Fijalkowski, Agata

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=IJC The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Journal of Law in Context, 10 (3), pp 295-314 2014, © 2014 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2014/9/5

Y1 - 2014/9/5

N2 - This article examines the criminalisation of symbols of the past. It considers the 2011 judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In this compact and well-ordered decision, the Tribunal, with reference to key European examples, critically assesses the constitutionality of criminal law provisions that prohibit the dissemination and public use of symbols of the past that pertained to fascist, Communist, or other totalitarian content. This article considers the Tribunal’s ruling within three important contexts: firstly, the European, where the concept of totalitarian crimes has become a European question and subject of European human rights, namely the freedom of expression; secondly, post-dictatorial Europe, where specific states have addressed the use of totalitarian symbols in their respective criminal laws; and finally, transitional justice, where the criminalisation of symbols of the past has attained a central and permanent feature in European narratives about justice. Significantly, these cases reveal the temporal element of transitional justice. This article discusses the two case studies of most relevance to Poland, namely that of Germany and Hungary. Reference is also made to the Baltic States, where there has been a concerted effort, together with Poland, to bring the notion of totalitarian crimes and histories to the attention of Europe. The article concurs that the cases concerning the use of symbols is an excellent illustration of where memory and law intersect. Using historical, comparative and contextual methodologies the paper demonstrates the legal philosophical complexities of the crime, political realities, and key dimensions of transitional justice and its relationship to expression, law and memory.

AB - This article examines the criminalisation of symbols of the past. It considers the 2011 judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In this compact and well-ordered decision, the Tribunal, with reference to key European examples, critically assesses the constitutionality of criminal law provisions that prohibit the dissemination and public use of symbols of the past that pertained to fascist, Communist, or other totalitarian content. This article considers the Tribunal’s ruling within three important contexts: firstly, the European, where the concept of totalitarian crimes has become a European question and subject of European human rights, namely the freedom of expression; secondly, post-dictatorial Europe, where specific states have addressed the use of totalitarian symbols in their respective criminal laws; and finally, transitional justice, where the criminalisation of symbols of the past has attained a central and permanent feature in European narratives about justice. Significantly, these cases reveal the temporal element of transitional justice. This article discusses the two case studies of most relevance to Poland, namely that of Germany and Hungary. Reference is also made to the Baltic States, where there has been a concerted effort, together with Poland, to bring the notion of totalitarian crimes and histories to the attention of Europe. The article concurs that the cases concerning the use of symbols is an excellent illustration of where memory and law intersect. Using historical, comparative and contextual methodologies the paper demonstrates the legal philosophical complexities of the crime, political realities, and key dimensions of transitional justice and its relationship to expression, law and memory.

KW - totalitarian symbols

KW - Communism

KW - European human rights

KW - transitional justice

KW - Polish Constitutional Tribunal

KW - Hungarian Constitutional Court

U2 - 10.1017/S1744552314000135

DO - 10.1017/S1744552314000135

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 295

EP - 314

JO - International Journal of Law in Context

JF - International Journal of Law in Context

SN - 1744-5523

IS - 3

ER -