Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals. / Conyon, Martin.
In: Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, 10.2001, p. 276-285.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Conyon, M 2001, 'The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals', Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00255

APA

Conyon, M. (2001). The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(4), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00255

Vancouver

Conyon M. The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2001 Oct;9(4):276-285. doi: 10.1111/1467-8683.00255

Author

Conyon, Martin. / The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals. In: Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2001 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 276-285.

Bibtex

@article{5a4a8231f38c4aa287a349e338f3f867,
title = "The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals",
abstract = "In March 2001 the government announced that new disclosure rules relating to UK boardroom pay would be introduced. This paper critically evaluates these proposals. The new proposals emerged from the government{\textquoteright}s Directors Remuneration consultative document issued in July 1999. The current paper makes the following contributions to the governance literature. First, the new disclosure proposals are reviewed. I suggest that they are incomplete both in their detail and scope. I also suggest that the government has conceded that more US style executive compensation disclosure is required. Second, I describe US executive compensation disclosure practices. If convergence in disclosure practice is potentially desirable then a more systematic comparison and analysis of current disclosure policies in the two economies is warranted.",
keywords = "Boardroom pay and information disclosure",
author = "Martin Conyon",
year = "2001",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/1467-8683.00255",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "276--285",
journal = "Corporate Governance: An International Review",
issn = "0964-8410",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Disclosure of UK Boardroom Pay: The March 2001 DTI proposals

AU - Conyon, Martin

PY - 2001/10

Y1 - 2001/10

N2 - In March 2001 the government announced that new disclosure rules relating to UK boardroom pay would be introduced. This paper critically evaluates these proposals. The new proposals emerged from the government’s Directors Remuneration consultative document issued in July 1999. The current paper makes the following contributions to the governance literature. First, the new disclosure proposals are reviewed. I suggest that they are incomplete both in their detail and scope. I also suggest that the government has conceded that more US style executive compensation disclosure is required. Second, I describe US executive compensation disclosure practices. If convergence in disclosure practice is potentially desirable then a more systematic comparison and analysis of current disclosure policies in the two economies is warranted.

AB - In March 2001 the government announced that new disclosure rules relating to UK boardroom pay would be introduced. This paper critically evaluates these proposals. The new proposals emerged from the government’s Directors Remuneration consultative document issued in July 1999. The current paper makes the following contributions to the governance literature. First, the new disclosure proposals are reviewed. I suggest that they are incomplete both in their detail and scope. I also suggest that the government has conceded that more US style executive compensation disclosure is required. Second, I describe US executive compensation disclosure practices. If convergence in disclosure practice is potentially desirable then a more systematic comparison and analysis of current disclosure policies in the two economies is warranted.

KW - Boardroom pay and information disclosure

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8683.00255

DO - 10.1111/1467-8683.00255

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 276

EP - 285

JO - Corporate Governance: An International Review

JF - Corporate Governance: An International Review

SN - 0964-8410

IS - 4

ER -