Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The effect of question expectedness and experie...

Research

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. / Warmelink, Lara; Vrij, Aldert; Mann, Samantha et al.
In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 141, No. 2, 10.2012, p. 178-183.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Warmelink, L, Vrij, A, Mann, S, Jundi, S & Granhag, PA 2012, 'The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions', Acta Psychologica, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011

APA

Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011

Vancouver

Warmelink L, Vrij A, Mann S, Jundi S, Granhag PA. The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica. 2012 Oct;141(2):178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011

Author

Warmelink, Lara ; Vrij, Aldert ; Mann, Samantha et al. / The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. In: Acta Psychologica. 2012 ; Vol. 141, No. 2. pp. 178-183.

Bibtex

@article{041a9d487690426dbd640ef40b3b0330,
title = "The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions",
abstract = "In recent years researchers have started to focus on lying about intentions (Granhag, 2010). In the present experiment participants were interviewed about their forthcoming trip. We tested the hypothesis that liars (N = 43) compared to truth tellers (N = 43) would give fewer details to unexpected questions about planning, transportation and the core event, but an equal amount or more detail to expected questions about the purpose of the trip. We also tested the hypothesis that participants who had previously experienced the intention (i.e., they had made such a trip before) would give more detail than those who had never experienced the intended action. The unexpected question hypothesis was supported, whereas the previous experience effect only emerged in interactions. The benefit of using different types of questions for lie detection purposes is discussed",
author = "Lara Warmelink and Aldert Vrij and Samantha Mann and Shyma Jundi and P.A. Granhag",
year = "2012",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "178--183",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions

AU - Warmelink, Lara

AU - Vrij, Aldert

AU - Mann, Samantha

AU - Jundi, Shyma

AU - Granhag, P.A.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - In recent years researchers have started to focus on lying about intentions (Granhag, 2010). In the present experiment participants were interviewed about their forthcoming trip. We tested the hypothesis that liars (N = 43) compared to truth tellers (N = 43) would give fewer details to unexpected questions about planning, transportation and the core event, but an equal amount or more detail to expected questions about the purpose of the trip. We also tested the hypothesis that participants who had previously experienced the intention (i.e., they had made such a trip before) would give more detail than those who had never experienced the intended action. The unexpected question hypothesis was supported, whereas the previous experience effect only emerged in interactions. The benefit of using different types of questions for lie detection purposes is discussed

AB - In recent years researchers have started to focus on lying about intentions (Granhag, 2010). In the present experiment participants were interviewed about their forthcoming trip. We tested the hypothesis that liars (N = 43) compared to truth tellers (N = 43) would give fewer details to unexpected questions about planning, transportation and the core event, but an equal amount or more detail to expected questions about the purpose of the trip. We also tested the hypothesis that participants who had previously experienced the intention (i.e., they had made such a trip before) would give more detail than those who had never experienced the intended action. The unexpected question hypothesis was supported, whereas the previous experience effect only emerged in interactions. The benefit of using different types of questions for lie detection purposes is discussed

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 141

SP - 178

EP - 183

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

IS - 2

ER -