Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco cont...
View graph of relations

The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study. / Allen, Kirk Christopher; Kypridemos, Chris; Hyseni, Lirjie et al.
In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 2016, 292, 01.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Allen, K. C., Kypridemos, C., Hyseni, L., Gilmore, A. B., Diggle, P. J., Whitehead, M., Capewell, S., & O'Flaherty, M. (2016). The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study. BMC Public Health, 2016, Article 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

Vancouver

Allen KC, Kypridemos C, Hyseni L, Gilmore AB, Diggle PJ, Whitehead M et al. The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study. BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 1;2016:292. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

Author

Allen, Kirk Christopher ; Kypridemos, Chris ; Hyseni, Lirjie et al. / The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality : a modelling study. In: BMC Public Health. 2016 ; Vol. 2016.

Bibtex

@article{88868862d3dc4c899ff73d8e837198f3,
title = "The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study",
abstract = "BackgroundSmoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.MethodsEffect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35–74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.ResultsThe model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3 % (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1–4 %), from 20 to 17 % in absolute terms, or by 15 % in relative terms (95 % CI: 7–21 %). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31 to 25 %, or a 6 % reduction (95 % CI: 2–7 %).There would be some 3300 (95 % CI: 2200–4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015–2025, a 2 % (95 % CI: 1.4–2.9 %) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4 % (95 % CI: 3–9 %).ConclusionsFurther, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.",
keywords = "Tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) , Coronary heart disease , Socioeconomic inequalities",
author = "Allen, {Kirk Christopher} and Chris Kypridemos and Lirjie Hyseni and Gilmore, {Anna B.} and Diggle, {Peter John} and Margaret Whitehead and Simon Capewell and Martin O'Flaherty",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BMC",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality

T2 - a modelling study

AU - Allen, Kirk Christopher

AU - Kypridemos, Chris

AU - Hyseni, Lirjie

AU - Gilmore, Anna B.

AU - Diggle, Peter John

AU - Whitehead, Margaret

AU - Capewell, Simon

AU - O'Flaherty, Martin

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - BackgroundSmoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.MethodsEffect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35–74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.ResultsThe model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3 % (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1–4 %), from 20 to 17 % in absolute terms, or by 15 % in relative terms (95 % CI: 7–21 %). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31 to 25 %, or a 6 % reduction (95 % CI: 2–7 %).There would be some 3300 (95 % CI: 2200–4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015–2025, a 2 % (95 % CI: 1.4–2.9 %) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4 % (95 % CI: 3–9 %).ConclusionsFurther, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.

AB - BackgroundSmoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.MethodsEffect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35–74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.ResultsThe model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3 % (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1–4 %), from 20 to 17 % in absolute terms, or by 15 % in relative terms (95 % CI: 7–21 %). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31 to 25 %, or a 6 % reduction (95 % CI: 2–7 %).There would be some 3300 (95 % CI: 2200–4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015–2025, a 2 % (95 % CI: 1.4–2.9 %) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4 % (95 % CI: 3–9 %).ConclusionsFurther, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.

KW - Tobacco control

KW - Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)

KW - Coronary heart disease

KW - Socioeconomic inequalities

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

DO - 10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2016

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

M1 - 292

ER -