Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The effects of perceived anonymity on altruisti...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment. / Piazza, Jared; Bering, Jesse.
In: Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2008, p. 487-501.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Piazza J, Bering J. The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment. Evolutionary Psychology. 2008;6(3):487-501.

Author

Piazza, Jared ; Bering, Jesse. / The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment. In: Evolutionary Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 487-501.

Bibtex

@article{f3d85f2bad5c4b68989955ff53e3901e,
title = "The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment",
abstract = "Previous studies investigating altruistic punishment have confounded the effects of two independent variables: information transmission (or breach of privacy) and personal identification (or breach of anonymity). Here we report findings from a brief study in which participants were asked to respond to a social norm violation (i.e., an anonymous actor had behaved selfishly in an economic game) by deciding whether to sacrifice their own endowment to punish this person. A third of the participants were told that their economic decisions would be made known to another player but could not be identified (privacy breach condition), whereas another third were informed that their decision as well as their names would be made known (anonymity breach condition). (The decisions of control participants were completely anonymous and private.) Participants also justified their economic decisions and reported their emotional experiences. The results were participants punished most in the privacy and anonymity breach conditions and least in the control condition. These findings have implications for existing evolutionary accounts of altruistic punishment.",
keywords = "Altruistic punishment, anonymity, privacy, reputation, third-party punishment game",
author = "Jared Piazza and Jesse Bering",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "487--501",
journal = "Evolutionary Psychology",
publisher = "Human Nature Review",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment

AU - Piazza, Jared

AU - Bering, Jesse

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Previous studies investigating altruistic punishment have confounded the effects of two independent variables: information transmission (or breach of privacy) and personal identification (or breach of anonymity). Here we report findings from a brief study in which participants were asked to respond to a social norm violation (i.e., an anonymous actor had behaved selfishly in an economic game) by deciding whether to sacrifice their own endowment to punish this person. A third of the participants were told that their economic decisions would be made known to another player but could not be identified (privacy breach condition), whereas another third were informed that their decision as well as their names would be made known (anonymity breach condition). (The decisions of control participants were completely anonymous and private.) Participants also justified their economic decisions and reported their emotional experiences. The results were participants punished most in the privacy and anonymity breach conditions and least in the control condition. These findings have implications for existing evolutionary accounts of altruistic punishment.

AB - Previous studies investigating altruistic punishment have confounded the effects of two independent variables: information transmission (or breach of privacy) and personal identification (or breach of anonymity). Here we report findings from a brief study in which participants were asked to respond to a social norm violation (i.e., an anonymous actor had behaved selfishly in an economic game) by deciding whether to sacrifice their own endowment to punish this person. A third of the participants were told that their economic decisions would be made known to another player but could not be identified (privacy breach condition), whereas another third were informed that their decision as well as their names would be made known (anonymity breach condition). (The decisions of control participants were completely anonymous and private.) Participants also justified their economic decisions and reported their emotional experiences. The results were participants punished most in the privacy and anonymity breach conditions and least in the control condition. These findings have implications for existing evolutionary accounts of altruistic punishment.

KW - Altruistic punishment

KW - anonymity

KW - privacy

KW - reputation

KW - third-party punishment game

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 487

EP - 501

JO - Evolutionary Psychology

JF - Evolutionary Psychology

IS - 3

ER -