Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effects of Unexpected Questions on Detecting Familiar and Unfamiliar Lies
AU - Warmelink, Lara
AU - Vrij, Aldert
AU - Mann, Samantha
AU - Leal, Sharon
AU - Poletiek, Fenna H.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Previous research suggests that lie detection can be improved by asking the interviewee unexpected questions. The present experiment investigates the effect of two types of unexpected questions: background questions and detail questions, on detecting lies about topics with which the interviewee is (a) familiar or (b) unfamiliar. In this experiment, 66 participants read interviews in which interviewees answered background or detail questions, either truthfully or deceptively. Those who answered deceptively could be lying about a topic they were familiar with or about a topic they were unfamiliar with. The participants were asked to judge whether the interviewees were lying. The results revealed that background questions distinguished truths from both types of lies, while the detail questions distinguished truths from unfamiliar lies, but not from familiar lies. The implications of these findings are discussed.
AB - Previous research suggests that lie detection can be improved by asking the interviewee unexpected questions. The present experiment investigates the effect of two types of unexpected questions: background questions and detail questions, on detecting lies about topics with which the interviewee is (a) familiar or (b) unfamiliar. In this experiment, 66 participants read interviews in which interviewees answered background or detail questions, either truthfully or deceptively. Those who answered deceptively could be lying about a topic they were familiar with or about a topic they were unfamiliar with. The participants were asked to judge whether the interviewees were lying. The results revealed that background questions distinguished truths from both types of lies, while the detail questions distinguished truths from unfamiliar lies, but not from familiar lies. The implications of these findings are discussed.
KW - deception detection
KW - interviewing
U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2011.619058
DO - 10.1080/13218719.2011.619058
M3 - Journal article
VL - 20
SP - 29
EP - 35
JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
SN - 1934-1687
IS - 1
ER -