Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The epiphyseal scar

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The epiphyseal scar: changing perceptions in relation to skeletal age estimation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The epiphyseal scar: changing perceptions in relation to skeletal age estimation. / Davies, Catriona; Hackman, Lucina; Black, Sue.
In: Annals of Human Biology, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2015, p. 348-357.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Davies C, Hackman L, Black S. The epiphyseal scar: changing perceptions in relation to skeletal age estimation. Annals of Human Biology. 2015;42(4):348-357. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1031825

Author

Davies, Catriona ; Hackman, Lucina ; Black, Sue. / The epiphyseal scar : changing perceptions in relation to skeletal age estimation. In: Annals of Human Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 348-357.

Bibtex

@article{9844f4f6a79f48779834296449fad66c,
title = "The epiphyseal scar: changing perceptions in relation to skeletal age estimation",
abstract = "Background: It is imperative that all methods applied in skeletal age estimation and the criteria on which they are based have a strong evidential basis. The relationship between the persistence of epiphyseal scars and chronological age, however, has remained largely untested.Aims: To assess the relationships between the level of persistence of the epiphyseal scar and chronological age, biological sex and side of the body in relation to the interpretation of epiphyseal scars in methods of skeletal age estimation.Subjects and methods: A sample of radiographic images was obtained from the Tayside NHS Trust, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK. This included images of four anatomical regions from living female and male individuals aged between 20-50 years.Results: Some remnant of an epiphyseal scar was found in 78-99% of individuals examined in this study. The level of persistence of epiphyseal scars was also found to vary between anatomical regions.Conclusion: The overall relationship between chronological age and the level of persistence or obliteration of the epiphyseal scar was found to be of insufficient strength to support a causative link. It is, therefore, necessary that caution is employed in their interpretation in relation to skeletal age estimation practices.",
keywords = "Forensic anthropology, human identification, humerus, radius, tibia",
author = "Catriona Davies and Lucina Hackman and Sue Black",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3109/03014460.2015.1031825",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "348--357",
journal = "Annals of Human Biology",
issn = "0301-4460",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The epiphyseal scar

T2 - changing perceptions in relation to skeletal age estimation

AU - Davies, Catriona

AU - Hackman, Lucina

AU - Black, Sue

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: It is imperative that all methods applied in skeletal age estimation and the criteria on which they are based have a strong evidential basis. The relationship between the persistence of epiphyseal scars and chronological age, however, has remained largely untested.Aims: To assess the relationships between the level of persistence of the epiphyseal scar and chronological age, biological sex and side of the body in relation to the interpretation of epiphyseal scars in methods of skeletal age estimation.Subjects and methods: A sample of radiographic images was obtained from the Tayside NHS Trust, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK. This included images of four anatomical regions from living female and male individuals aged between 20-50 years.Results: Some remnant of an epiphyseal scar was found in 78-99% of individuals examined in this study. The level of persistence of epiphyseal scars was also found to vary between anatomical regions.Conclusion: The overall relationship between chronological age and the level of persistence or obliteration of the epiphyseal scar was found to be of insufficient strength to support a causative link. It is, therefore, necessary that caution is employed in their interpretation in relation to skeletal age estimation practices.

AB - Background: It is imperative that all methods applied in skeletal age estimation and the criteria on which they are based have a strong evidential basis. The relationship between the persistence of epiphyseal scars and chronological age, however, has remained largely untested.Aims: To assess the relationships between the level of persistence of the epiphyseal scar and chronological age, biological sex and side of the body in relation to the interpretation of epiphyseal scars in methods of skeletal age estimation.Subjects and methods: A sample of radiographic images was obtained from the Tayside NHS Trust, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK. This included images of four anatomical regions from living female and male individuals aged between 20-50 years.Results: Some remnant of an epiphyseal scar was found in 78-99% of individuals examined in this study. The level of persistence of epiphyseal scars was also found to vary between anatomical regions.Conclusion: The overall relationship between chronological age and the level of persistence or obliteration of the epiphyseal scar was found to be of insufficient strength to support a causative link. It is, therefore, necessary that caution is employed in their interpretation in relation to skeletal age estimation practices.

KW - Forensic anthropology

KW - human identification

KW - humerus

KW - radius

KW - tibia

U2 - 10.3109/03014460.2015.1031825

DO - 10.3109/03014460.2015.1031825

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 348

EP - 357

JO - Annals of Human Biology

JF - Annals of Human Biology

SN - 0301-4460

IS - 4

ER -