Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The evaluation of guidelines to aid the informa...
View graph of relations

The evaluation of guidelines to aid the information designer.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The evaluation of guidelines to aid the information designer. / Cooper, Rachel; Cooper, C. L.
In: Design Studies, Vol. 5, No. 4, 10.1984, p. 248-267.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cooper R, Cooper CL. The evaluation of guidelines to aid the information designer. Design Studies. 1984 Oct;5(4):248-267. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(84)90060-7

Author

Bibtex

@article{8cd67e9f9c1042908a02ba1c64d02fa9,
title = "The evaluation of guidelines to aid the information designer.",
abstract = "This study was concerned with a comparative evaluation of students who used procedural guidelines (developed to help them cope with new technology) and those who did not. Typographic students from six colleges were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (who used the procedural guidelines) or to the control group (who were not exposed to the guidelines). All the students carried out the same design task. Each student's completed design was assessed by independent designers and compositors, who were unaware of the research intention or methodology or the particular students they were assessing. The students' work was evaluated in terms of 10 criteria variables by the designer and 10 different criteria variables by the compositor. In addition, the students were asked to fill in a 20 item self report user satisfaction questionnaire on how they felt about the design task. Data were also collected in respect to timekeeping, students' background and demographics, the particular courses they were following, etc. The data were analysed by t-tests for significant differences between the means and standard deviations of the experimental and control groups.",
keywords = "typography, information design, design education",
author = "Rachel Cooper and Cooper, {C. L.}",
year = "1984",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/0142-694X(84)90060-7",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "248--267",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of guidelines to aid the information designer.

AU - Cooper, Rachel

AU - Cooper, C. L.

PY - 1984/10

Y1 - 1984/10

N2 - This study was concerned with a comparative evaluation of students who used procedural guidelines (developed to help them cope with new technology) and those who did not. Typographic students from six colleges were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (who used the procedural guidelines) or to the control group (who were not exposed to the guidelines). All the students carried out the same design task. Each student's completed design was assessed by independent designers and compositors, who were unaware of the research intention or methodology or the particular students they were assessing. The students' work was evaluated in terms of 10 criteria variables by the designer and 10 different criteria variables by the compositor. In addition, the students were asked to fill in a 20 item self report user satisfaction questionnaire on how they felt about the design task. Data were also collected in respect to timekeeping, students' background and demographics, the particular courses they were following, etc. The data were analysed by t-tests for significant differences between the means and standard deviations of the experimental and control groups.

AB - This study was concerned with a comparative evaluation of students who used procedural guidelines (developed to help them cope with new technology) and those who did not. Typographic students from six colleges were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (who used the procedural guidelines) or to the control group (who were not exposed to the guidelines). All the students carried out the same design task. Each student's completed design was assessed by independent designers and compositors, who were unaware of the research intention or methodology or the particular students they were assessing. The students' work was evaluated in terms of 10 criteria variables by the designer and 10 different criteria variables by the compositor. In addition, the students were asked to fill in a 20 item self report user satisfaction questionnaire on how they felt about the design task. Data were also collected in respect to timekeeping, students' background and demographics, the particular courses they were following, etc. The data were analysed by t-tests for significant differences between the means and standard deviations of the experimental and control groups.

KW - typography

KW - information design

KW - design education

U2 - 10.1016/0142-694X(84)90060-7

DO - 10.1016/0142-694X(84)90060-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 248

EP - 267

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

IS - 4

ER -