Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The factualization of ‘I suppose’ in American E...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The factualization of ‘I suppose’ in American English: a corpus based study of the subjectification of epistemic predicates toward factuality

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The factualization of ‘I suppose’ in American English: a corpus based study of the subjectification of epistemic predicates toward factuality. / Tantucci, Vittorio.
In: SpringerPlus, Vol. 5, 1773, 12.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7ad3550572a34a13815742980da58a1a,
title = "The factualization of {\textquoteleft}I suppose{\textquoteright} in American English: a corpus based study of the subjectification of epistemic predicates toward factuality",
abstract = "This work provides a case study centered on the cognitive phenomenon of factualization, viz. “the SP/W{\textquoteright}s increasing certainty about the realization of an event or situation” (cf. Tantucci 2014, 2015a, b, 2016b). Factualization corresponds to a cognitive-control mechanism (i.e. Kan et al. 2013) specifically occurring in the epistemic domain. It instantiates both in online language production and throughout the diachronic reanalysis of a construction (i.e. grammaticalization, semasiological change or constructionalization, cf. Traugott and Dasher 2002; Traugott and Trousdale 2013). The case presented here focuses on the diachronic change of the epistemic construction I suppose in British English. It will be shown that I suppose developed through time an increasingly factual usage out of an original meaning conveying weak epistemicity. Qualitative and quantitative data from the Corpus of Historical American English will support the general claim that—to varying degrees—epistemic predicates diachronically tend to develop new polysemies encoding a Speaker/writer{\textquoteright}s (henceforth SP/W) “subjectified form of certainty” towards a proposition P (cf. Tantucci 2015a: 371).",
author = "Vittorio Tantucci",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/s40064-016-3438-0",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "SpringerPlus",
issn = "2193-1801",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The factualization of ‘I suppose’ in American English

T2 - a corpus based study of the subjectification of epistemic predicates toward factuality

AU - Tantucci, Vittorio

PY - 2016/10/12

Y1 - 2016/10/12

N2 - This work provides a case study centered on the cognitive phenomenon of factualization, viz. “the SP/W’s increasing certainty about the realization of an event or situation” (cf. Tantucci 2014, 2015a, b, 2016b). Factualization corresponds to a cognitive-control mechanism (i.e. Kan et al. 2013) specifically occurring in the epistemic domain. It instantiates both in online language production and throughout the diachronic reanalysis of a construction (i.e. grammaticalization, semasiological change or constructionalization, cf. Traugott and Dasher 2002; Traugott and Trousdale 2013). The case presented here focuses on the diachronic change of the epistemic construction I suppose in British English. It will be shown that I suppose developed through time an increasingly factual usage out of an original meaning conveying weak epistemicity. Qualitative and quantitative data from the Corpus of Historical American English will support the general claim that—to varying degrees—epistemic predicates diachronically tend to develop new polysemies encoding a Speaker/writer’s (henceforth SP/W) “subjectified form of certainty” towards a proposition P (cf. Tantucci 2015a: 371).

AB - This work provides a case study centered on the cognitive phenomenon of factualization, viz. “the SP/W’s increasing certainty about the realization of an event or situation” (cf. Tantucci 2014, 2015a, b, 2016b). Factualization corresponds to a cognitive-control mechanism (i.e. Kan et al. 2013) specifically occurring in the epistemic domain. It instantiates both in online language production and throughout the diachronic reanalysis of a construction (i.e. grammaticalization, semasiological change or constructionalization, cf. Traugott and Dasher 2002; Traugott and Trousdale 2013). The case presented here focuses on the diachronic change of the epistemic construction I suppose in British English. It will be shown that I suppose developed through time an increasingly factual usage out of an original meaning conveying weak epistemicity. Qualitative and quantitative data from the Corpus of Historical American English will support the general claim that—to varying degrees—epistemic predicates diachronically tend to develop new polysemies encoding a Speaker/writer’s (henceforth SP/W) “subjectified form of certainty” towards a proposition P (cf. Tantucci 2015a: 371).

U2 - 10.1186/s40064-016-3438-0

DO - 10.1186/s40064-016-3438-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

JO - SpringerPlus

JF - SpringerPlus

SN - 2193-1801

M1 - 1773

ER -