Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Household Benefit Cap

Electronic data

  • benefit_cap_final_accepted_version

    Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Social Policy, 51, (1), pp 2-19 2022, © 2020 Cambridge University Press.

    Accepted author manuscript, 300 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Household Benefit Cap: understanding the restriction of benefit income in Britain

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/01/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Social Policy
Issue number1
Volume51
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)2-19
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date27/10/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Britain’s Household Benefit Cap restricts the amount of benefit income unemployed households can receive. In this article, it is examined using material held at the UK’s National Archives recording debates about a proposal to introduce a similar policy – a benefit limit – in the first Thatcher Conservative government elected in 1979. It was rejected, but the Household Benefit Cap was introduced three decades later. The article locates debates about, and the practice of restricting benefit income, in perennial social security concerns with the financial incentive to do waged work. The article argues that while there are material differences that help explain the different policy outcomes in 1980 and 2010, they can primarily be explained by changing ideas about the roles of social security policy, including the development of the ‘incentive paradigm’ concerned with manipulating behaviour; a loss of concern with the hardship that would come with the introduction of a benefit restriction and a view that institutions other than the state are better placed to address poverty and buttress work incentives.

Bibliographic note

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Social Policy, 51, (1), pp 2-19 2022, © 2020 Cambridge University Press.