Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The impact of community rehabilitation for acqu...
View graph of relations

The impact of community rehabilitation for acquired brain injury on carer burden : an exploratory study.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The impact of community rehabilitation for acquired brain injury on carer burden : an exploratory study. / Smith, Michael J.; Vaughan, Frances L.; Cox, Linda J. et al.
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 76-81.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Smith MJ, Vaughan FL, Cox LJ, McConville H, Roberts M, Stoddart S et al. The impact of community rehabilitation for acquired brain injury on carer burden : an exploratory study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2006 Jan;21(1):76-81.

Author

Smith, Michael J. ; Vaughan, Frances L. ; Cox, Linda J. et al. / The impact of community rehabilitation for acquired brain injury on carer burden : an exploratory study. In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 76-81.

Bibtex

@article{e15c323d084f49a1b38c69f84bd76451,
title = "The impact of community rehabilitation for acquired brain injury on carer burden : an exploratory study.",
abstract = "Objectives: This study evaluated the relative efficacy of a community rehabilitation service and a more traditional outpatient service for carers of people with an acquired brain injury. Methods: Seventeen carers who had received a community intervention were retrospectively compared with 24 carers who had received an outpatient service. Dependent variables were level of met family need, a measure of family dysfunction, carer psychopathology, and carer emotional acceptance. Results: The community sample fared significantly better on all measures except carer psychopathology. Conclusions: These results suggest that community-based services have efficacy for the carer and family. There is a clear need for large clinical trials using standardized instruments to establish what models of service delivery benefit carers.",
author = "Smith, {Michael J.} and Vaughan, {Frances L.} and Cox, {Linda J.} and Helen McConville and Mark Roberts and Sheila Stoddart and Adina Lew",
year = "2006",
month = jan,
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "76--81",
journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",
issn = "0885-9701",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of community rehabilitation for acquired brain injury on carer burden : an exploratory study.

AU - Smith, Michael J.

AU - Vaughan, Frances L.

AU - Cox, Linda J.

AU - McConville, Helen

AU - Roberts, Mark

AU - Stoddart, Sheila

AU - Lew, Adina

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Objectives: This study evaluated the relative efficacy of a community rehabilitation service and a more traditional outpatient service for carers of people with an acquired brain injury. Methods: Seventeen carers who had received a community intervention were retrospectively compared with 24 carers who had received an outpatient service. Dependent variables were level of met family need, a measure of family dysfunction, carer psychopathology, and carer emotional acceptance. Results: The community sample fared significantly better on all measures except carer psychopathology. Conclusions: These results suggest that community-based services have efficacy for the carer and family. There is a clear need for large clinical trials using standardized instruments to establish what models of service delivery benefit carers.

AB - Objectives: This study evaluated the relative efficacy of a community rehabilitation service and a more traditional outpatient service for carers of people with an acquired brain injury. Methods: Seventeen carers who had received a community intervention were retrospectively compared with 24 carers who had received an outpatient service. Dependent variables were level of met family need, a measure of family dysfunction, carer psychopathology, and carer emotional acceptance. Results: The community sample fared significantly better on all measures except carer psychopathology. Conclusions: These results suggest that community-based services have efficacy for the carer and family. There is a clear need for large clinical trials using standardized instruments to establish what models of service delivery benefit carers.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 76

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

SN - 0885-9701

IS - 1

ER -