Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The impact of public smoking bans on well-being...

Electronic data

  • Manuscript_14072017_RR_CLEAN

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Yang, M. and Zucchelli, E. (2018), The impact of public smoking bans on well‐being externalities: Evidence from a policy experiment. Scott J Polit Econ, 65: 224-247. doi:10.1111/sjpe.12150 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjpe.12150/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.02 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The impact of public smoking bans on well-being externalities: evidence from a policy experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The impact of public smoking bans on well-being externalities : evidence from a policy experiment. / Yang, Miaoqing; Zucchelli, Eugenio.

In: Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 65, No. 3, 07.2018, p. 224-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Yang, Miaoqing ; Zucchelli, Eugenio. / The impact of public smoking bans on well-being externalities : evidence from a policy experiment. In: Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 2018 ; Vol. 65, No. 3. pp. 224-247.

Bibtex

@article{46f149630747470a81d395424692d3c2,
title = "The impact of public smoking bans on well-being externalities: evidence from a policy experiment",
abstract = "Recent studies on the effects of anti-smoking policies on subjective well-being present mixed results and do not account for potential externalities, especially among couples. We contribute to the literature by evaluating the impact of smoking bans on well-being externalities among smokers and non-smokers as well as couples of different types of smokers. We exploit the policy experiment provided by the timing of the UK public smoking bans and measure well-being via the GHQ. We employ matching techniques combined with flexible difference-in-differences fixed effects panel data models on data from the British Household Panel Survey. The joint use of matching methods with fixed effects specifications allows building more comparable treatment and control groups, producing less model-dependent results and accounting for individual-level unobserved heterogeneity. We find that public smoking bans appear to have a statistically significant short-term positive impact on the well-being of married individuals, especially among women with dependent children. These effects appear to be robust to alternative specifications and placebo tests and are discussed in the light of the economic theory and recent evidence. ",
keywords = "subjective well-being, smoking bans, policy evaluation, BHPS",
author = "Miaoqing Yang and Eugenio Zucchelli",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Yang, M. and Zucchelli, E. (2018), The impact of public smoking bans on well‐being externalities: Evidence from a policy experiment. Scott J Polit Econ, 65: 224-247. doi:10.1111/sjpe.12150 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjpe.12150/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
year = "2018",
month = jul
doi = "10.1111/sjpe.12150",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "224--247",
journal = "Scottish Journal of Political Economy",
issn = "0036-9292",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of public smoking bans on well-being externalities

T2 - evidence from a policy experiment

AU - Yang, Miaoqing

AU - Zucchelli, Eugenio

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Yang, M. and Zucchelli, E. (2018), The impact of public smoking bans on well‐being externalities: Evidence from a policy experiment. Scott J Polit Econ, 65: 224-247. doi:10.1111/sjpe.12150 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjpe.12150/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Recent studies on the effects of anti-smoking policies on subjective well-being present mixed results and do not account for potential externalities, especially among couples. We contribute to the literature by evaluating the impact of smoking bans on well-being externalities among smokers and non-smokers as well as couples of different types of smokers. We exploit the policy experiment provided by the timing of the UK public smoking bans and measure well-being via the GHQ. We employ matching techniques combined with flexible difference-in-differences fixed effects panel data models on data from the British Household Panel Survey. The joint use of matching methods with fixed effects specifications allows building more comparable treatment and control groups, producing less model-dependent results and accounting for individual-level unobserved heterogeneity. We find that public smoking bans appear to have a statistically significant short-term positive impact on the well-being of married individuals, especially among women with dependent children. These effects appear to be robust to alternative specifications and placebo tests and are discussed in the light of the economic theory and recent evidence.

AB - Recent studies on the effects of anti-smoking policies on subjective well-being present mixed results and do not account for potential externalities, especially among couples. We contribute to the literature by evaluating the impact of smoking bans on well-being externalities among smokers and non-smokers as well as couples of different types of smokers. We exploit the policy experiment provided by the timing of the UK public smoking bans and measure well-being via the GHQ. We employ matching techniques combined with flexible difference-in-differences fixed effects panel data models on data from the British Household Panel Survey. The joint use of matching methods with fixed effects specifications allows building more comparable treatment and control groups, producing less model-dependent results and accounting for individual-level unobserved heterogeneity. We find that public smoking bans appear to have a statistically significant short-term positive impact on the well-being of married individuals, especially among women with dependent children. These effects appear to be robust to alternative specifications and placebo tests and are discussed in the light of the economic theory and recent evidence.

KW - subjective well-being

KW - smoking bans

KW - policy evaluation

KW - BHPS

U2 - 10.1111/sjpe.12150

DO - 10.1111/sjpe.12150

M3 - Journal article

VL - 65

SP - 224

EP - 247

JO - Scottish Journal of Political Economy

JF - Scottish Journal of Political Economy

SN - 0036-9292

IS - 3

ER -