Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The influence of a lack of social support and p...

Electronic data

  • 2019LeighDClinPsy

    Final published version, 3.6 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The influence of a lack of social support and perceived stigma for individuals with multiple sclerosis and motor neurone disease

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published
  • Natalie Leigh
Close
Publication date2020
Number of pages228
QualificationPhD
Awarding Institution
Supervisors/Advisors
Publisher
  • Lancaster University
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Section 1 describes a systematic literature review examining psychological correlates of perceived social support in multiple sclerosis. Five subject databases (CINAHL; EMBASE; PsycINFO; PubMed; Web of Science) were searched using a single search string (correlates OR factors AND “social support” and “multiple sclerosis”). Of the 21 articles reviewed, 20 reported statistically significant relationships. Most studies (n = 11) correlated perceived social support with depression or mental health aspects of quality of life and all
found the higher the social support, the lower depression and higher positive mental health. Studies using regression identified that greater social support was a significant predictor of lower anxiety, anger, depression, loneliness and better mental aspects of health-related quality of life, postpartum emotional distress and self-esteem. The results provide evidence for significant relationships between social support and various psychological variables.

Section 2 describes a research study which aimed to identify whether a lack of social support and increased levels of perceived stigma predicted psychological distress for individuals with motor neurone disease (MND). Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. Significant correlations were identified between social support, felt and enacted stigma and measures of psychological distress. Regression analyses revealed that enacted stigma was not an independent predictor in any of the models and social support did not remain a significant independent predictor for stress when stigma entered the model.
Moreover, felt stigma was a more powerful significant independent predictor in all the models. It may be important to consider social support and stigma when aiming to improve psychological distress for individuals with MND.

Section 3 describes a critical and reflective appraisal of aspects of the whole
thesis. This includes an overview of the main findings, discusses recruitment issues, the conceptual framework of disability employed to guide the terminology usage, and makes recommendations for future research.