Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter.
View graph of relations

The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter. / Crawford, T. J.; Higham, S.; Hill, S.
In: Vision Research, Vol. 45, No. 27, 12.2005, p. 3365-3378.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Crawford, TJ, Higham, S & Hill, S 2005, 'The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter.', Vision Research, vol. 45, no. 27, pp. 3365-3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024

APA

Crawford, T. J., Higham, S., & Hill, S. (2005). The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter. Vision Research, 45(27), 3365-3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024

Vancouver

Crawford TJ, Higham S, Hill S. The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter. Vision Research. 2005 Dec;45(27):3365-3378. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024

Author

Crawford, T. J. ; Higham, S. ; Hill, S. / The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter. In: Vision Research. 2005 ; Vol. 45, No. 27. pp. 3365-3378.

Bibtex

@article{2cf61620c32d4f9faff5a1d17d725a8d,
title = "The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter.",
abstract = "A series of experiments were conducted to examine the inhibitory effect of a visual distracter on saccadic eye movements. Participants were presented with a sequence of two critical displays. In one display a red target was presented together with a green distracter. This was followed by a display with a new red target presented in isolation at one of three locations with respect to the previous display. The lone target was presented either at the location of the recent target, the location of the recent distracter, or a new location. Participants were instructed to fixate the target in both displays and to ignore the green distracter. Experiment 1 revealed a significant increase in saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target was presented at the location of the recent distracter. Experiment 2 revealed that SRTs increased only in the conditions where the new target was presented at the location of the recent distracter, irrespective of its colour. Experiment 3 found that the inhibitory effect lasted for at least 2 s. In Experiment 4 the inhibitory effect was abolished when a lone distracter (i.e., anti-target) was presented without a target. Experiments 5 and 6 revealed that inhibition at the location of the recent target ({\textquoteleft}inhibition-of-return{\textquoteright}) also emerged with a shorter inter-display interval and when the distracter was removed from the recent display. These results distinguished between inhibition of a recent distracter and {\textquoteleft}inhibition-of-return{\textquoteright} and are consistent with models of competitive interactions which generate inhibitory effects on the spatial representation of a distracter.",
keywords = "Attention, Distracter, Inhibition-of-return, Negative priming, Saccadic eye movement",
author = "Crawford, {T. J.} and S. Higham and S. Hill",
note = "Crawford was senior author and PI on grant that funded research (Bial Foundation, PSA 7672). RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Psychology",
year = "2005",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "3365--3378",
journal = "Vision Research",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "27",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Inhibitory Effect of Recent Distracter.

AU - Crawford, T. J.

AU - Higham, S.

AU - Hill, S.

N1 - Crawford was senior author and PI on grant that funded research (Bial Foundation, PSA 7672). RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Psychology

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - A series of experiments were conducted to examine the inhibitory effect of a visual distracter on saccadic eye movements. Participants were presented with a sequence of two critical displays. In one display a red target was presented together with a green distracter. This was followed by a display with a new red target presented in isolation at one of three locations with respect to the previous display. The lone target was presented either at the location of the recent target, the location of the recent distracter, or a new location. Participants were instructed to fixate the target in both displays and to ignore the green distracter. Experiment 1 revealed a significant increase in saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target was presented at the location of the recent distracter. Experiment 2 revealed that SRTs increased only in the conditions where the new target was presented at the location of the recent distracter, irrespective of its colour. Experiment 3 found that the inhibitory effect lasted for at least 2 s. In Experiment 4 the inhibitory effect was abolished when a lone distracter (i.e., anti-target) was presented without a target. Experiments 5 and 6 revealed that inhibition at the location of the recent target (‘inhibition-of-return’) also emerged with a shorter inter-display interval and when the distracter was removed from the recent display. These results distinguished between inhibition of a recent distracter and ‘inhibition-of-return’ and are consistent with models of competitive interactions which generate inhibitory effects on the spatial representation of a distracter.

AB - A series of experiments were conducted to examine the inhibitory effect of a visual distracter on saccadic eye movements. Participants were presented with a sequence of two critical displays. In one display a red target was presented together with a green distracter. This was followed by a display with a new red target presented in isolation at one of three locations with respect to the previous display. The lone target was presented either at the location of the recent target, the location of the recent distracter, or a new location. Participants were instructed to fixate the target in both displays and to ignore the green distracter. Experiment 1 revealed a significant increase in saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target was presented at the location of the recent distracter. Experiment 2 revealed that SRTs increased only in the conditions where the new target was presented at the location of the recent distracter, irrespective of its colour. Experiment 3 found that the inhibitory effect lasted for at least 2 s. In Experiment 4 the inhibitory effect was abolished when a lone distracter (i.e., anti-target) was presented without a target. Experiments 5 and 6 revealed that inhibition at the location of the recent target (‘inhibition-of-return’) also emerged with a shorter inter-display interval and when the distracter was removed from the recent display. These results distinguished between inhibition of a recent distracter and ‘inhibition-of-return’ and are consistent with models of competitive interactions which generate inhibitory effects on the spatial representation of a distracter.

KW - Attention

KW - Distracter

KW - Inhibition-of-return

KW - Negative priming

KW - Saccadic eye movement

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 3365

EP - 3378

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

IS - 27

ER -