Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The ‘interrogative gaze’

Electronic data

  • The_InterrogativeGazeFinal

    Rights statement: This article has been accepted for publication in Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), Volume 27, Issue 3, 2017, pages: 319-350, © 2017 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.

    Accepted author manuscript, 715 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The ‘interrogative gaze’: Making video calling and messaging ‘accountable’

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The ‘interrogative gaze’ : Making video calling and messaging ‘accountable’ . / Harper, R.; Rintel, S.; Watson, R.; O’Hara, K.

In: Pragmatics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.11.2017, p. 319-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

Harper, R, Rintel, S, Watson, R & O’Hara, K 2017, 'The ‘interrogative gaze’: Making video calling and messaging ‘accountable’ ', Pragmatics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 319-350. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.3.02har

APA

Vancouver

Author

Harper, R. ; Rintel, S. ; Watson, R. ; O’Hara, K. / The ‘interrogative gaze’ : Making video calling and messaging ‘accountable’ . In: Pragmatics. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 319-350.

Bibtex

@article{f0f4d72a466547a7a9956be7296abcad,
title = "The {\textquoteleft}interrogative gaze{\textquoteright}: Making video calling and messaging {\textquoteleft}accountable{\textquoteright} ",
abstract = "This paper identifies salient properties of how talk about video communication is organised interactionally, and how this interaction invokes an implied order of behaviour that is treated as {\textquoteleft}typical{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}accountably representative{\textquoteright} of video communication. This invoked order will be called an interrogative gaze. This is an implied orientation to action, one that is used as a jointly managed interpretative schema that allows video communication to be talked about and understood as rationally, purposively and collaboratively undertaken in particular, {\textquoteleft}known in common{\textquoteright} ways. This applies irrespective of whether the actions in question are prospective (are about to happen) or have been undertaken in the past and are being accounted for in the present or are {\textquoteleft}generally the case{\textquoteright} - in current talk. The paper shows how this constitutive device also aids in sense making through such things as topic management in video-mediated interaction, and in elaborating the salience of the relationship between this and the patterned governance of social affairs - viz, mother-daughter, friend-friend - as normatively achieved outcomes. It will be shown how the interrogative gaze is variously appropriate and consequentially invoked not just in terms of what is done in a video call or making such calls accountable, but in helping articulate different orders of connection between persons, and how these orders have implications for sensible and appropriate behaviour in video calling and hence, for the type of persons who are involved. This, in turn, explains how a decision to avoid using video communication is made an accountably reasonable thing to do. The relevance of these findings for the sociology of everyday life and the philosophy of action are explored. {\textcopyright} John Benjamins Publishing Company.",
keywords = "Conversation analysis, Ethnomethodology, Family, Friendship, Participation frameworks, Philosophy of action, Reasoning, Skype, Sociology, Video calling, Video mediated communication",
author = "R. Harper and S. Rintel and R. Watson and K. O{\textquoteright}Hara",
note = "This article has been accepted for publication in Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), Volume 27, Issue 3, 2017, pages: 319-350, {\textcopyright} 2017 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.",
year = "2017",
month = nov
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/prag.27.3.02har",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "319--350",
journal = "Pragmatics",
issn = "1018-2101",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ‘interrogative gaze’

T2 - Making video calling and messaging ‘accountable’

AU - Harper, R.

AU - Rintel, S.

AU - Watson, R.

AU - O’Hara, K.

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), Volume 27, Issue 3, 2017, pages: 319-350, © 2017 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - This paper identifies salient properties of how talk about video communication is organised interactionally, and how this interaction invokes an implied order of behaviour that is treated as ‘typical’ and ‘accountably representative’ of video communication. This invoked order will be called an interrogative gaze. This is an implied orientation to action, one that is used as a jointly managed interpretative schema that allows video communication to be talked about and understood as rationally, purposively and collaboratively undertaken in particular, ‘known in common’ ways. This applies irrespective of whether the actions in question are prospective (are about to happen) or have been undertaken in the past and are being accounted for in the present or are ‘generally the case’ - in current talk. The paper shows how this constitutive device also aids in sense making through such things as topic management in video-mediated interaction, and in elaborating the salience of the relationship between this and the patterned governance of social affairs - viz, mother-daughter, friend-friend - as normatively achieved outcomes. It will be shown how the interrogative gaze is variously appropriate and consequentially invoked not just in terms of what is done in a video call or making such calls accountable, but in helping articulate different orders of connection between persons, and how these orders have implications for sensible and appropriate behaviour in video calling and hence, for the type of persons who are involved. This, in turn, explains how a decision to avoid using video communication is made an accountably reasonable thing to do. The relevance of these findings for the sociology of everyday life and the philosophy of action are explored. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

AB - This paper identifies salient properties of how talk about video communication is organised interactionally, and how this interaction invokes an implied order of behaviour that is treated as ‘typical’ and ‘accountably representative’ of video communication. This invoked order will be called an interrogative gaze. This is an implied orientation to action, one that is used as a jointly managed interpretative schema that allows video communication to be talked about and understood as rationally, purposively and collaboratively undertaken in particular, ‘known in common’ ways. This applies irrespective of whether the actions in question are prospective (are about to happen) or have been undertaken in the past and are being accounted for in the present or are ‘generally the case’ - in current talk. The paper shows how this constitutive device also aids in sense making through such things as topic management in video-mediated interaction, and in elaborating the salience of the relationship between this and the patterned governance of social affairs - viz, mother-daughter, friend-friend - as normatively achieved outcomes. It will be shown how the interrogative gaze is variously appropriate and consequentially invoked not just in terms of what is done in a video call or making such calls accountable, but in helping articulate different orders of connection between persons, and how these orders have implications for sensible and appropriate behaviour in video calling and hence, for the type of persons who are involved. This, in turn, explains how a decision to avoid using video communication is made an accountably reasonable thing to do. The relevance of these findings for the sociology of everyday life and the philosophy of action are explored. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

KW - Conversation analysis

KW - Ethnomethodology

KW - Family

KW - Friendship

KW - Participation frameworks

KW - Philosophy of action

KW - Reasoning

KW - Skype

KW - Sociology

KW - Video calling

KW - Video mediated communication

U2 - 10.1075/prag.27.3.02har

DO - 10.1075/prag.27.3.02har

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 319

EP - 350

JO - Pragmatics

JF - Pragmatics

SN - 1018-2101

IS - 3

ER -