We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK


97% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The judiciary as a primary definer on anti-socia...
View graph of relations

« Back

The judiciary as a primary definer on anti-social behaviour orders

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article


<mark>Journal publication date</mark>09/2007
<mark>Journal</mark>The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
Number of pages14
<mark>Original language</mark>English


It has been argued that the introduction of anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) has created a ‘new domain ofprofessional powerand knowledge’ (Brown 2004, p.203).That is, local authorities have become ‘the mainagency of [social]control’ (Brown 2004, p.205). Alternatively, this article considers the effects of subjective legislative terminology, pivotal jurisprudential decisions, the courts’ protection of individual liberties versus the public interest, and the relevance of an over burdened summary criminal justice system, and attempts to locate the position of the judiciary within ASBO cases, not as a supportive or subordinate one, but in fact as a component of elementary importance.