12,000
We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK
94%
94% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating
The Justification of Financial Futures Exchanges.
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings › Chapter
Published
| Publication date | 2000 |
|---|---|
| Host publication | Modern Financial Techniques, Derivatives and Law |
| Editors | A. Hudson |
| Place of publication | The Hague ; Boston |
| Publisher | Kluwer Law International |
| Pages | 121-133 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Edition | 16 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9041197818 |
| Original language | English |
Publication series
| Name | International banking, finance, and economic law |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Kluwer Law International |
Abstract
The invention of exchange-traded financial futures by commodity exchanges has been justified by Chicagoan financial economics and law and economics on the basis of the unrealistic assumption that trading is costless. Acceptance of this quite circular argument has led to the delegation of extensive powers of self-regulation as public authorities have abnegated their responsibility to evaluate the regulation of derivatives trading, including matters such as the development of new financial products and the governance of exchanges, in welfare-economic terms. Instead of a prejudice toward market �freedom�, there should be stronger public consideration of the optimal public-private mix of regulatory governance structures. This paper proposes criteria for the evaluation of the functional justification of exchange-traded futures as a guide for public policy aimed at reducing the volatility of financial markets.