Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The key elements of strategic competence

Electronic data

View graph of relations

The key elements of strategic competence

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

The key elements of strategic competence. / Sparrow, P R; Hodgkinson, G P.
Lancaster University: Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources, 2007. (Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Sparrow, PR & Hodgkinson, GP 2007 'The key elements of strategic competence' Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources, Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources, Lancaster University.

APA

Sparrow, P. R., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2007). The key elements of strategic competence. (Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources). Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources.

Vancouver

Sparrow PR, Hodgkinson GP. The key elements of strategic competence. Lancaster University: Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources. 2007. (Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources).

Author

Sparrow, P R ; Hodgkinson, G P. / The key elements of strategic competence. Lancaster University : Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources, 2007. (Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources).

Bibtex

@techreport{181dbe211a1b4bf3a38ef18df0fe33c4,
title = "The key elements of strategic competence",
abstract = "In today's organisations senior managers have to cope with strategic environments characterised by high levels of uncertainty, volumes of information, and shifting business models. As a consequence, their individual strategic expertise may not be sufficient to help the organisation chart its way through this environment. Many talk about the need for organisational agility in this environment. One problem facing organisations in this kind of environment is how best to recruit and select senior managers for this world and how to develop the organisation's competence to manage accordingly. Drawing on a range of theoretical and empirical insights from strategic management and the cognitive and organisational sciences, we argue that strategic competence constitutes the ability of organisations and the individuals who operate within them to work within their cognitive limitations in such a way that they are able to maintain an appropriate level of responsiveness to the contingencies confronting them. Using the language of the resource based view of the firm, we argue that this meta-level competence represents a confluence of individual and organisational characteristics, suitably configured to enable the detection of those weak signals indicative of the need for change and to act accordingly, thereby minimising the dangers of cognitive bias and cognitive inertia. In an era of unprecedented informational burdens and instability, we argue that this competence is central to the longer-term survival and well being of the organisation. We conclude with a consideration of the major scientific challenges that lie ahead, if the ideas contained within this paper are to be validated.",
keywords = "Strategic management, Organisational agility, Management cognition",
author = "Sparrow, {P R} and Hodgkinson, {G P}",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
series = "Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources",
publisher = "Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The key elements of strategic competence

AU - Sparrow, P R

AU - Hodgkinson, G P

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In today's organisations senior managers have to cope with strategic environments characterised by high levels of uncertainty, volumes of information, and shifting business models. As a consequence, their individual strategic expertise may not be sufficient to help the organisation chart its way through this environment. Many talk about the need for organisational agility in this environment. One problem facing organisations in this kind of environment is how best to recruit and select senior managers for this world and how to develop the organisation's competence to manage accordingly. Drawing on a range of theoretical and empirical insights from strategic management and the cognitive and organisational sciences, we argue that strategic competence constitutes the ability of organisations and the individuals who operate within them to work within their cognitive limitations in such a way that they are able to maintain an appropriate level of responsiveness to the contingencies confronting them. Using the language of the resource based view of the firm, we argue that this meta-level competence represents a confluence of individual and organisational characteristics, suitably configured to enable the detection of those weak signals indicative of the need for change and to act accordingly, thereby minimising the dangers of cognitive bias and cognitive inertia. In an era of unprecedented informational burdens and instability, we argue that this competence is central to the longer-term survival and well being of the organisation. We conclude with a consideration of the major scientific challenges that lie ahead, if the ideas contained within this paper are to be validated.

AB - In today's organisations senior managers have to cope with strategic environments characterised by high levels of uncertainty, volumes of information, and shifting business models. As a consequence, their individual strategic expertise may not be sufficient to help the organisation chart its way through this environment. Many talk about the need for organisational agility in this environment. One problem facing organisations in this kind of environment is how best to recruit and select senior managers for this world and how to develop the organisation's competence to manage accordingly. Drawing on a range of theoretical and empirical insights from strategic management and the cognitive and organisational sciences, we argue that strategic competence constitutes the ability of organisations and the individuals who operate within them to work within their cognitive limitations in such a way that they are able to maintain an appropriate level of responsiveness to the contingencies confronting them. Using the language of the resource based view of the firm, we argue that this meta-level competence represents a confluence of individual and organisational characteristics, suitably configured to enable the detection of those weak signals indicative of the need for change and to act accordingly, thereby minimising the dangers of cognitive bias and cognitive inertia. In an era of unprecedented informational burdens and instability, we argue that this competence is central to the longer-term survival and well being of the organisation. We conclude with a consideration of the major scientific challenges that lie ahead, if the ideas contained within this paper are to be validated.

KW - Strategic management

KW - Organisational agility

KW - Management cognition

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources

BT - The key elements of strategic competence

PB - Centre for Performance-Led Human Resources

CY - Lancaster University

ER -