Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Language of Colour

Electronic data

  • 274

    Rights statement: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

    Final published version, 5 MB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

View graph of relations

The Language of Colour: Neurology and the Ineffable

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/2012
<mark>Journal</mark>Biolinguistics
Issue number3-4
Volume6
Number of pages16
Pages (from-to)475-490
<mark>State</mark>Published
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

It is often claimed, following Joseph Levine, that there is an ‘explanatory gap’ between ordinary physical facts and the way we perceive things, so that it is impossible to explain, among other things, why colours actually look the way they do. C.L. Hardin, by contrast, argues that there are sufficient asymmetries between colours to traverse this gap. This paper argues that the terms we use to characterize colours, such as ‘warm’ and ‘cool’, are not well understood, and that we need to understand the neurological basis for such associations if we are even to understand what is fully meant by saying, for example, that red is a warm colour. This paper also speculates on how Hardin’s strategy can be generalized. A PowerPoint presentation that depicts inverted colour qualia is attached as an appendix.

Bibliographic note

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.