Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The malaria testing and treatment landscape in ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016. / ACTwatch Group; Michael, Daniel; Mkunde, Sigsbert Patila.

In: Malaria Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 202, 24.04.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

ACTwatch Group, Michael, D & Mkunde, SP 2017, 'The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016', Malaria Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7

APA

ACTwatch Group, Michael, D., & Mkunde, S. P. (2017). The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016. Malaria Journal, 16(1), [202]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7

Vancouver

ACTwatch Group, Michael D, Mkunde SP. The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016. Malaria Journal. 2017 Apr 24;16(1). 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7

Author

ACTwatch Group ; Michael, Daniel ; Mkunde, Sigsbert Patila. / The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016. In: Malaria Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{3e4f5981cf00487c9b77fdce3d2771aa,
title = "The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Understanding the key characteristics of malaria testing and treatment is essential to the control of a disease that continues to pose a major risk of morbidity and mortality in mainland Tanzania, with evidence of a resurgence of the disease in recent years. The introduction of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for malaria, alongside policies to promote rational case management following testing, highlights the need for evidence of anti-malarial and testing markets in the country. The results of the most recent mainland Tanzania ACTwatch outlet survey are presented here, including data on the availability, market share and price of anti-malarials and malaria diagnosis in 2016.METHODS: A nationally-representative malaria outlet survey was conducted between 18th May and 2nd July, 2016. A census of public and private outlets with potential to distribute malaria testing and/or treatment was conducted among a representative sample of administrative units. An audit was completed for all anti-malarials, malaria rapid (RDT) diagnostic tests and microscopy.RESULTS: A total of 5867 outlets were included in the nationally representative survey, across both public and private sectors. In the public sector, availability of malaria testing was 92.3% and quality-assured (QA) ACT was 89.1% among all screened outlets. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was stocked by 51.8% of the public sector and injectable artesunate was found in 71.4% of all screened public health facilities. Among anti-malarial private-sector stockists, availability of testing was 15.7, and 65.1% had QA ACT available. The public sector accounted for 83.4% of the total market share for malaria diagnostics. The private sector accounted for 63.9% of the total anti-malarial market, and anti-malarials were most commonly distributed through accredited drug dispensing outlets (ADDOs) (39.0%), duka la dawa baridi (DLDBs) (13.3%) and pharmacies (6.7%). QA ACT comprised 33.1% of the national market share (12.2% public sector and 20.9% private sector). SP accounted for 53.3% of the total market for anti-malarials across both private and public sectors (31.3 and 22.0% of the total market, respectively). The median price per adult equivalent treatment dose (AETD) of QA ACT in the private sector was $1.40, almost 1.5 times more expensive than the median price per AETD of SP ($1.05). In the private sector, 79.3% of providers perceived ACT to be the most effective treatment for uncomplicated malaria for adults and 88.4% perceived this for children.CONCLUSIONS: While public sector preparedness for appropriate malaria testing and case management is showing encouraging signs, QA ACT availability and market share in the private sector continues to be sub-optimal for most outlet types. Furthermore, it is concerning that SP continues to predominate in the anti-malarial market. The reasons for this remain unclear, but are likely to be in part related to price, availability and provider knowledge or preferences. Continued efforts to implement government policy around malaria diagnosis and case management should be encouraged.",
keywords = "Antimalarials/therapeutic use, Artemisinins/therapeutic use, Commerce/statistics & numerical data, Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data, Drug Combinations, Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data, Humans, Malaria/diagnosis, Private Sector/statistics & numerical data, Public Sector/statistics & numerical data, Tanzania",
author = "{ACTwatch Group} and Daniel Michael and Mkunde, {Sigsbert Patila} and Irene Kyomuhangi",
year = "2017",
month = apr
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Malaria Journal",
issn = "1475-2875",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016

AU - ACTwatch Group

AU - Michael, Daniel

AU - Mkunde, Sigsbert Patila

AU - Kyomuhangi, Irene

PY - 2017/4/24

Y1 - 2017/4/24

N2 - BACKGROUND: Understanding the key characteristics of malaria testing and treatment is essential to the control of a disease that continues to pose a major risk of morbidity and mortality in mainland Tanzania, with evidence of a resurgence of the disease in recent years. The introduction of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for malaria, alongside policies to promote rational case management following testing, highlights the need for evidence of anti-malarial and testing markets in the country. The results of the most recent mainland Tanzania ACTwatch outlet survey are presented here, including data on the availability, market share and price of anti-malarials and malaria diagnosis in 2016.METHODS: A nationally-representative malaria outlet survey was conducted between 18th May and 2nd July, 2016. A census of public and private outlets with potential to distribute malaria testing and/or treatment was conducted among a representative sample of administrative units. An audit was completed for all anti-malarials, malaria rapid (RDT) diagnostic tests and microscopy.RESULTS: A total of 5867 outlets were included in the nationally representative survey, across both public and private sectors. In the public sector, availability of malaria testing was 92.3% and quality-assured (QA) ACT was 89.1% among all screened outlets. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was stocked by 51.8% of the public sector and injectable artesunate was found in 71.4% of all screened public health facilities. Among anti-malarial private-sector stockists, availability of testing was 15.7, and 65.1% had QA ACT available. The public sector accounted for 83.4% of the total market share for malaria diagnostics. The private sector accounted for 63.9% of the total anti-malarial market, and anti-malarials were most commonly distributed through accredited drug dispensing outlets (ADDOs) (39.0%), duka la dawa baridi (DLDBs) (13.3%) and pharmacies (6.7%). QA ACT comprised 33.1% of the national market share (12.2% public sector and 20.9% private sector). SP accounted for 53.3% of the total market for anti-malarials across both private and public sectors (31.3 and 22.0% of the total market, respectively). The median price per adult equivalent treatment dose (AETD) of QA ACT in the private sector was $1.40, almost 1.5 times more expensive than the median price per AETD of SP ($1.05). In the private sector, 79.3% of providers perceived ACT to be the most effective treatment for uncomplicated malaria for adults and 88.4% perceived this for children.CONCLUSIONS: While public sector preparedness for appropriate malaria testing and case management is showing encouraging signs, QA ACT availability and market share in the private sector continues to be sub-optimal for most outlet types. Furthermore, it is concerning that SP continues to predominate in the anti-malarial market. The reasons for this remain unclear, but are likely to be in part related to price, availability and provider knowledge or preferences. Continued efforts to implement government policy around malaria diagnosis and case management should be encouraged.

AB - BACKGROUND: Understanding the key characteristics of malaria testing and treatment is essential to the control of a disease that continues to pose a major risk of morbidity and mortality in mainland Tanzania, with evidence of a resurgence of the disease in recent years. The introduction of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for malaria, alongside policies to promote rational case management following testing, highlights the need for evidence of anti-malarial and testing markets in the country. The results of the most recent mainland Tanzania ACTwatch outlet survey are presented here, including data on the availability, market share and price of anti-malarials and malaria diagnosis in 2016.METHODS: A nationally-representative malaria outlet survey was conducted between 18th May and 2nd July, 2016. A census of public and private outlets with potential to distribute malaria testing and/or treatment was conducted among a representative sample of administrative units. An audit was completed for all anti-malarials, malaria rapid (RDT) diagnostic tests and microscopy.RESULTS: A total of 5867 outlets were included in the nationally representative survey, across both public and private sectors. In the public sector, availability of malaria testing was 92.3% and quality-assured (QA) ACT was 89.1% among all screened outlets. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was stocked by 51.8% of the public sector and injectable artesunate was found in 71.4% of all screened public health facilities. Among anti-malarial private-sector stockists, availability of testing was 15.7, and 65.1% had QA ACT available. The public sector accounted for 83.4% of the total market share for malaria diagnostics. The private sector accounted for 63.9% of the total anti-malarial market, and anti-malarials were most commonly distributed through accredited drug dispensing outlets (ADDOs) (39.0%), duka la dawa baridi (DLDBs) (13.3%) and pharmacies (6.7%). QA ACT comprised 33.1% of the national market share (12.2% public sector and 20.9% private sector). SP accounted for 53.3% of the total market for anti-malarials across both private and public sectors (31.3 and 22.0% of the total market, respectively). The median price per adult equivalent treatment dose (AETD) of QA ACT in the private sector was $1.40, almost 1.5 times more expensive than the median price per AETD of SP ($1.05). In the private sector, 79.3% of providers perceived ACT to be the most effective treatment for uncomplicated malaria for adults and 88.4% perceived this for children.CONCLUSIONS: While public sector preparedness for appropriate malaria testing and case management is showing encouraging signs, QA ACT availability and market share in the private sector continues to be sub-optimal for most outlet types. Furthermore, it is concerning that SP continues to predominate in the anti-malarial market. The reasons for this remain unclear, but are likely to be in part related to price, availability and provider knowledge or preferences. Continued efforts to implement government policy around malaria diagnosis and case management should be encouraged.

KW - Antimalarials/therapeutic use

KW - Artemisinins/therapeutic use

KW - Commerce/statistics & numerical data

KW - Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data

KW - Drug Combinations

KW - Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data

KW - Humans

KW - Malaria/diagnosis

KW - Private Sector/statistics & numerical data

KW - Public Sector/statistics & numerical data

KW - Tanzania

U2 - 10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7

DO - 10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28521811

VL - 16

JO - Malaria Journal

JF - Malaria Journal

SN - 1475-2875

IS - 1

M1 - 202

ER -