Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing societ...
View graph of relations

The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era. / Walby, S.
In: Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.08.2003, p. 529-546.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Walby S. The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era. Sociology. 2003 Aug 1;37(3):529-546. doi: 10.1177/00380385030373008

Author

Bibtex

@article{a33e8d1815b843d188c3a20a0d00f1fc,
title = "The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era.",
abstract = "The analysis of globalization requires attention to the social and political units that are being variously undermined, restructured or facilitated by this process. Sociology has often assumed that the unit of analysis is society, in which economic, political and cultural processes are coterminous, and that this concept maps onto that of nation-state. This article argues that the nation-state is more mythical than real. This is for four reasons: first, there are more nations than states; second, several key examples of presumed nation-states are actually empires; third, there are diverse and significant polities in addition to states, including the European Union and some organized religions; fourth, polities overlap and rarely politically saturate the territory where they are located. An implication of acknowledging the wider range and overlapping nature of polities is to open greater conceptual space for the analysis of gender and ethnicity in analyses of globalization. Finally the article re-conceptualizes `polities' and `society'.",
keywords = "difference • globalization • nation-state • polities • theory",
author = "S. Walby",
note = "This article was the subject of a response in the journal, to which the author was invited to reply. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Sociology",
year = "2003",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/00380385030373008",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "529--546",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "1469-8684",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era.

AU - Walby, S.

N1 - This article was the subject of a response in the journal, to which the author was invited to reply. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Sociology

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - The analysis of globalization requires attention to the social and political units that are being variously undermined, restructured or facilitated by this process. Sociology has often assumed that the unit of analysis is society, in which economic, political and cultural processes are coterminous, and that this concept maps onto that of nation-state. This article argues that the nation-state is more mythical than real. This is for four reasons: first, there are more nations than states; second, several key examples of presumed nation-states are actually empires; third, there are diverse and significant polities in addition to states, including the European Union and some organized religions; fourth, polities overlap and rarely politically saturate the territory where they are located. An implication of acknowledging the wider range and overlapping nature of polities is to open greater conceptual space for the analysis of gender and ethnicity in analyses of globalization. Finally the article re-conceptualizes `polities' and `society'.

AB - The analysis of globalization requires attention to the social and political units that are being variously undermined, restructured or facilitated by this process. Sociology has often assumed that the unit of analysis is society, in which economic, political and cultural processes are coterminous, and that this concept maps onto that of nation-state. This article argues that the nation-state is more mythical than real. This is for four reasons: first, there are more nations than states; second, several key examples of presumed nation-states are actually empires; third, there are diverse and significant polities in addition to states, including the European Union and some organized religions; fourth, polities overlap and rarely politically saturate the territory where they are located. An implication of acknowledging the wider range and overlapping nature of polities is to open greater conceptual space for the analysis of gender and ethnicity in analyses of globalization. Finally the article re-conceptualizes `polities' and `society'.

KW - difference • globalization • nation-state • polities • theory

U2 - 10.1177/00380385030373008

DO - 10.1177/00380385030373008

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 529

EP - 546

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 1469-8684

IS - 3

ER -