Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian ...
View graph of relations

The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s. / Hinds, H A.
In: Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.08.2007, p. 153 - 177.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hinds, HA 2007, 'The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s.', Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 153 - 177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440350701432747

APA

Vancouver

Hinds HA. The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s. Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism. 2007 Aug 1;29(2):153 - 177. doi: 10.1080/01440350701432747

Author

Hinds, H A. / The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s. In: Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism. 2007 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 153 - 177.

Bibtex

@article{922b932f7876420abdb77bca235dd9c0,
title = "The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s.",
abstract = "Using G{\'e}rard Genette's concept of the {"}paratext,{"} this article explores the many and various circumscriptions that characterize much seventeenth-century radical religious writing: multiple titles, epigraphs, prefaces, dedicatory epistles, and marginalia. Through an examination of the work of two radical sectarian writers from the 1640s - Katherine Chidley, an Independent, and Mary Cary, a millenarian prophet - the essay analyses the ways in which their writings' paratextual apparatuses serve to negotiate their precarious position on the margins of mainstream religious culture. It is argued that, through paratextual processes of imitation, dispersal and proliferation, the authority of both text and author is simultaneously invoked, asserted and deferred. It is also argued that, precisely because of this complex relation to discursive authority, these processes are highly gendered, thereby suggesting that an analysis of paratextuality contributes to an understanding of sectarian writing as the site of the first major entry into public discursive space by English women writers.",
keywords = "paratexts, gender, radical religious sects, 1640s, Katherine Chidley, Mary Cary",
author = "Hinds, {H A}",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : English Language and Literature",
year = "2007",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01440350701432747",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "153 -- 177",
journal = "Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism",
issn = "0144-0357",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Paratextual Profusion of Radical Sectarian Women's Writing of the 1640s.

AU - Hinds, H A

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : English Language and Literature

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - Using Gérard Genette's concept of the "paratext," this article explores the many and various circumscriptions that characterize much seventeenth-century radical religious writing: multiple titles, epigraphs, prefaces, dedicatory epistles, and marginalia. Through an examination of the work of two radical sectarian writers from the 1640s - Katherine Chidley, an Independent, and Mary Cary, a millenarian prophet - the essay analyses the ways in which their writings' paratextual apparatuses serve to negotiate their precarious position on the margins of mainstream religious culture. It is argued that, through paratextual processes of imitation, dispersal and proliferation, the authority of both text and author is simultaneously invoked, asserted and deferred. It is also argued that, precisely because of this complex relation to discursive authority, these processes are highly gendered, thereby suggesting that an analysis of paratextuality contributes to an understanding of sectarian writing as the site of the first major entry into public discursive space by English women writers.

AB - Using Gérard Genette's concept of the "paratext," this article explores the many and various circumscriptions that characterize much seventeenth-century radical religious writing: multiple titles, epigraphs, prefaces, dedicatory epistles, and marginalia. Through an examination of the work of two radical sectarian writers from the 1640s - Katherine Chidley, an Independent, and Mary Cary, a millenarian prophet - the essay analyses the ways in which their writings' paratextual apparatuses serve to negotiate their precarious position on the margins of mainstream religious culture. It is argued that, through paratextual processes of imitation, dispersal and proliferation, the authority of both text and author is simultaneously invoked, asserted and deferred. It is also argued that, precisely because of this complex relation to discursive authority, these processes are highly gendered, thereby suggesting that an analysis of paratextuality contributes to an understanding of sectarian writing as the site of the first major entry into public discursive space by English women writers.

KW - paratexts

KW - gender

KW - radical religious sects

KW - 1640s

KW - Katherine Chidley

KW - Mary Cary

U2 - 10.1080/01440350701432747

DO - 10.1080/01440350701432747

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 153

EP - 177

JO - Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism

JF - Prose Studies : History, Theory, Criticism

SN - 0144-0357

IS - 2

ER -