Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Politics of Death
View graph of relations

The Politics of Death: On Life after the ‘End of History'.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Politics of Death: On Life after the ‘End of History'. / Palladino, Paolo.
In: Journal for Cultural Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, 07.2003, p. 321-335.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Palladino P. The Politics of Death: On Life after the ‘End of History'. Journal for Cultural Research. 2003 Jul;7(3):321-335. doi: 10.1080/1479758032000135988

Author

Palladino, Paolo. / The Politics of Death : On Life after the ‘End of History'. In: Journal for Cultural Research. 2003 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 321-335.

Bibtex

@article{fbc475c832eb443598c693b6ab584ec4,
title = "The Politics of Death: On Life after the {\textquoteleft}End of History'.",
abstract = "In this paper, the most recent writings by Giorgio Agamben and Bruno Latour are brought into dialog by examining what light they shed on contemporary debates concerning “end of life” decisions. More specifically, the paper focuses on the debates sparked by Diane Pretty's request for a grant of immunity against legal prosecution if her husband were to assist her to commit suicide and so terminate her increasingly unbearable suffering from motor neurone disease. The aim of this exercise is to articulate the presuppositions informing two influential and radically opposed views on the contemporary reconfiguration of relationships between humans, animals and other non-humans.",
author = "Paolo Palladino",
year = "2003",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1080/1479758032000135988",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "321--335",
journal = "Journal for Cultural Research",
issn = "1479-7585",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Politics of Death

T2 - On Life after the ‘End of History'.

AU - Palladino, Paolo

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - In this paper, the most recent writings by Giorgio Agamben and Bruno Latour are brought into dialog by examining what light they shed on contemporary debates concerning “end of life” decisions. More specifically, the paper focuses on the debates sparked by Diane Pretty's request for a grant of immunity against legal prosecution if her husband were to assist her to commit suicide and so terminate her increasingly unbearable suffering from motor neurone disease. The aim of this exercise is to articulate the presuppositions informing two influential and radically opposed views on the contemporary reconfiguration of relationships between humans, animals and other non-humans.

AB - In this paper, the most recent writings by Giorgio Agamben and Bruno Latour are brought into dialog by examining what light they shed on contemporary debates concerning “end of life” decisions. More specifically, the paper focuses on the debates sparked by Diane Pretty's request for a grant of immunity against legal prosecution if her husband were to assist her to commit suicide and so terminate her increasingly unbearable suffering from motor neurone disease. The aim of this exercise is to articulate the presuppositions informing two influential and radically opposed views on the contemporary reconfiguration of relationships between humans, animals and other non-humans.

U2 - 10.1080/1479758032000135988

DO - 10.1080/1479758032000135988

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 321

EP - 335

JO - Journal for Cultural Research

JF - Journal for Cultural Research

SN - 1479-7585

IS - 3

ER -