Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The principle of solidarity and fairness in res...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Responsibility Sharing- More than window dressing?

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Küçük, E. (2016) The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibility: More than Window Dressing?. European Law Journal, 22: 448–469. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12185 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12185/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 337 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The principle of solidarity and fairness in responsibility sharing: more than window dressing?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The principle of solidarity and fairness in responsibility sharing: more than window dressing? / Kucuk, Esin.
In: European Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 4, 23.12.2016, p. 448-469.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kucuk E. The principle of solidarity and fairness in responsibility sharing: more than window dressing? European Law Journal. 2016 Dec 23;22(4):448-469. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12185

Author

Bibtex

@article{45a1f89d466443d0bf73e56537c8b329,
title = "The principle of solidarity and fairness in responsibility sharing: more than window dressing?",
abstract = "The lack of fairness in asylum responsibility sharing within the EU has been a persistent problem demanding an urgent solution. This article seeks to inform the on-going debate on European solidarity instruments from a constitutional law perspective by taking the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility pursuant to Article 80 TFEU as its reference point. The article sees this principle as an important mechanism in both the enhancement of fairness in responsibility sharing and the protection of refugees. It argues that the combined reading of Article 80 TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides a strong reason to doubt the constitutionality of the Dublin III Regulation, and any decision reforming the asylum regime should take this view into account. Despite its limited enforceability, Article 80 TFEU can play an important role as an interpretation tool, in particular in the assessment of the legality of solidarity instruments.",
author = "Esin Kucuk",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: K{\"u}{\c c}{\"u}k, E. (2016) The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibility: More than Window Dressing?. European Law Journal, 22: 448–469. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12185 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12185/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1111/eulj.12185",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "448--469",
journal = "European Law Journal",
issn = "1351-5993",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The principle of solidarity and fairness in responsibility sharing

T2 - more than window dressing?

AU - Kucuk, Esin

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Küçük, E. (2016) The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibility: More than Window Dressing?. European Law Journal, 22: 448–469. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12185 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12185/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving

PY - 2016/12/23

Y1 - 2016/12/23

N2 - The lack of fairness in asylum responsibility sharing within the EU has been a persistent problem demanding an urgent solution. This article seeks to inform the on-going debate on European solidarity instruments from a constitutional law perspective by taking the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility pursuant to Article 80 TFEU as its reference point. The article sees this principle as an important mechanism in both the enhancement of fairness in responsibility sharing and the protection of refugees. It argues that the combined reading of Article 80 TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides a strong reason to doubt the constitutionality of the Dublin III Regulation, and any decision reforming the asylum regime should take this view into account. Despite its limited enforceability, Article 80 TFEU can play an important role as an interpretation tool, in particular in the assessment of the legality of solidarity instruments.

AB - The lack of fairness in asylum responsibility sharing within the EU has been a persistent problem demanding an urgent solution. This article seeks to inform the on-going debate on European solidarity instruments from a constitutional law perspective by taking the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility pursuant to Article 80 TFEU as its reference point. The article sees this principle as an important mechanism in both the enhancement of fairness in responsibility sharing and the protection of refugees. It argues that the combined reading of Article 80 TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides a strong reason to doubt the constitutionality of the Dublin III Regulation, and any decision reforming the asylum regime should take this view into account. Despite its limited enforceability, Article 80 TFEU can play an important role as an interpretation tool, in particular in the assessment of the legality of solidarity instruments.

U2 - 10.1111/eulj.12185

DO - 10.1111/eulj.12185

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 448

EP - 469

JO - European Law Journal

JF - European Law Journal

SN - 1351-5993

IS - 4

ER -