Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The proposed preferential priority of prepaying...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

View graph of relations

The proposed preferential priority of prepaying consumers: a fair pack of insolvency recommendations?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The proposed preferential priority of prepaying consumers: a fair pack of insolvency recommendations? / Akintola, Kayode.
In: Journal of Business Law, Vol. 2018, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{098cd4403b504bd68b11ca0281dad8d4,
title = "The proposed preferential priority of prepaying consumers: a fair pack of insolvency recommendations?",
abstract = "Comments on the Law Commission's proposal in its 2016 report {"}Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency{"} that prepaying consumers should be given preferential status in retail insolvencies, including: its rationale; its cost impact on the insolvency; the validity of trusts created for consumers in the {"}twilight period{"}; and the wider concern that the prescribed part cannot guarantee unsecured creditor realisations in insolvency.",
keywords = "Consumers, Corporate insolvency, Preferences, Prepayments, Prescribed part, Retailers, Unsecured creditors",
author = "Kayode Akintola",
note = "This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Business Law following peer review. The definitive published version J.B.L. 2018, 1, 1-14 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2018",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Journal of Business Law",
issn = "0021-9460",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The proposed preferential priority of prepaying consumers

T2 - a fair pack of insolvency recommendations?

AU - Akintola, Kayode

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Business Law following peer review. The definitive published version J.B.L. 2018, 1, 1-14 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Comments on the Law Commission's proposal in its 2016 report "Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency" that prepaying consumers should be given preferential status in retail insolvencies, including: its rationale; its cost impact on the insolvency; the validity of trusts created for consumers in the "twilight period"; and the wider concern that the prescribed part cannot guarantee unsecured creditor realisations in insolvency.

AB - Comments on the Law Commission's proposal in its 2016 report "Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency" that prepaying consumers should be given preferential status in retail insolvencies, including: its rationale; its cost impact on the insolvency; the validity of trusts created for consumers in the "twilight period"; and the wider concern that the prescribed part cannot guarantee unsecured creditor realisations in insolvency.

KW - Consumers

KW - Corporate insolvency

KW - Preferences

KW - Prepayments

KW - Prescribed part

KW - Retailers

KW - Unsecured creditors

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2018

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Business Law

JF - Journal of Business Law

SN - 0021-9460

IS - 1

ER -