Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Rhetoric and Practice of Self Determination...
View graph of relations

The Rhetoric and Practice of Self Determination. A Right of all Peoples or Political Institutions?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

The Rhetoric and Practice of Self Determination. A Right of all Peoples or Political Institutions? / Summers, James.

In: Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 73, No. 3, 10.2004, p. 325-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Summers, James. / The Rhetoric and Practice of Self Determination. A Right of all Peoples or Political Institutions?. In: Nordic Journal of International Law. 2004 ; Vol. 73, No. 3. pp. 325-363.

Bibtex

@article{6d4fcfc3e6284fa684c4a1bcb8dcc33a,
title = "The Rhetoric and Practice of Self Determination. A Right of all Peoples or Political Institutions?",
abstract = "The right of peoples to self-determination occupies a prominent position in a number of key international instruments, like the Human Rights Covenants and the United Nations Charter. Yet, despite this, many questions remain about the right in international law. This article is an analysis of the right which will look at its language in relation to its practical application. Its focus is on self-determination as a rhetoric, which, it is argued, is used to legitimize political activities by presenting those activities in terms of peoples and their self-realization. It will be further argued that as political rhetoric self-determination is most likely to be invoked in the institutions that direct and provide a focus for political life. This produces the paradox in the right. Although the rhetoric of self-determination suggests that peoples and their characteristics provide the basis for political institutions, the right, in fact, seems to be shaped in large part by those institutions. This, in turn, has important implications for how self-determination should be looked at in relation to other legal principles.",
author = "James Summers",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1163/1571810042790997",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "325--363",
journal = "Nordic Journal of International Law",
issn = "0902-7351",
publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Rhetoric and Practice of Self Determination. A Right of all Peoples or Political Institutions?

AU - Summers, James

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - The right of peoples to self-determination occupies a prominent position in a number of key international instruments, like the Human Rights Covenants and the United Nations Charter. Yet, despite this, many questions remain about the right in international law. This article is an analysis of the right which will look at its language in relation to its practical application. Its focus is on self-determination as a rhetoric, which, it is argued, is used to legitimize political activities by presenting those activities in terms of peoples and their self-realization. It will be further argued that as political rhetoric self-determination is most likely to be invoked in the institutions that direct and provide a focus for political life. This produces the paradox in the right. Although the rhetoric of self-determination suggests that peoples and their characteristics provide the basis for political institutions, the right, in fact, seems to be shaped in large part by those institutions. This, in turn, has important implications for how self-determination should be looked at in relation to other legal principles.

AB - The right of peoples to self-determination occupies a prominent position in a number of key international instruments, like the Human Rights Covenants and the United Nations Charter. Yet, despite this, many questions remain about the right in international law. This article is an analysis of the right which will look at its language in relation to its practical application. Its focus is on self-determination as a rhetoric, which, it is argued, is used to legitimize political activities by presenting those activities in terms of peoples and their self-realization. It will be further argued that as political rhetoric self-determination is most likely to be invoked in the institutions that direct and provide a focus for political life. This produces the paradox in the right. Although the rhetoric of self-determination suggests that peoples and their characteristics provide the basis for political institutions, the right, in fact, seems to be shaped in large part by those institutions. This, in turn, has important implications for how self-determination should be looked at in relation to other legal principles.

U2 - 10.1163/1571810042790997

DO - 10.1163/1571810042790997

M3 - Journal article

VL - 73

SP - 325

EP - 363

JO - Nordic Journal of International Law

JF - Nordic Journal of International Law

SN - 0902-7351

IS - 3

ER -