12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The simple view of reading:is it valid for diff...
View graph of relations

« Back

The simple view of reading:is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies?

Research output: Contribution to journalScientific review

Published

Journal publication date12/2011
Journal Educational Psychology Review
Journal number4
Volume23
Number of pages24
Pages553-576
Early online date26/08/11
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

We present a meta-analysis to test the validity of the Simple View of Reading Gough & Tunmer (Remedial and Special Education, 7:6-10, 1986) for beginner readers of English and other, more transparent, orthographies. Our meta-analytic approach established that the relative influence of decoding and linguistic comprehension on reading comprehension is different for readers of different types of orthography during the course of early reading development. Furthermore, we identified key differences in the relations among different measures of decoding and reading comprehension between readers of English and other more transparent orthographies. We discuss the implications for reading instruction and the diagnosis of reading difficulties, as well as our theoretical understanding of how component skills influence reading comprehension level.