Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The thing itself speaks
View graph of relations

The thing itself speaks: accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Abstractpeer-review

Published

Standard

The thing itself speaks: accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems. / Chopra, Amit K.; Singh, Munindar P.
2014. 22-22 Abstract from 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Abstractpeer-review

Harvard

Chopra, AK & Singh, MP 2014, 'The thing itself speaks: accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems', 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), United Kingdom, 26/08/14 - 26/08/14 pp. 22-22. https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2014.6893477

APA

Chopra, A. K., & Singh, M. P. (2014). The thing itself speaks: accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems. 22-22. Abstract from 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2014.6893477

Vancouver

Chopra AK, Singh MP. The thing itself speaks: accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems. 2014. Abstract from 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), United Kingdom. doi: 10.1109/RELAW.2014.6893477

Author

Chopra, Amit K. ; Singh, Munindar P. / The thing itself speaks : accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems. Abstract from 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), United Kingdom.1 p.

Bibtex

@conference{d8448d40934a4b6fbd2b32bada9e6a3d,
title = "The thing itself speaks: accountability as a foundation for requirements in sociotechnical systems",
abstract = "We consider sociotechnical systems (STSs) that facilitate social interaction among autonomous principals (either humans or organizations). Although accountability is a foundational concept in such systems, established requirements engineering methods do not support accountability in the broad sense of calling to account of one party by another. To address this short-coming, we propose the notion of accountability requirement. Further, we claim that to model an STS means to precisely capture the accountability requirements between its principals.",
author = "Chopra, {Amit K.} and Singh, {Munindar P.}",
note = "Accepted as full paper, but we decided to publish only a one page abstract; 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW) ; Conference date: 26-08-2014 Through 26-08-2014",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1109/RELAW.2014.6893477",
language = "English",
pages = "22--22",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - The thing itself speaks

T2 - 2014 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW)

AU - Chopra, Amit K.

AU - Singh, Munindar P.

N1 - Accepted as full paper, but we decided to publish only a one page abstract

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - We consider sociotechnical systems (STSs) that facilitate social interaction among autonomous principals (either humans or organizations). Although accountability is a foundational concept in such systems, established requirements engineering methods do not support accountability in the broad sense of calling to account of one party by another. To address this short-coming, we propose the notion of accountability requirement. Further, we claim that to model an STS means to precisely capture the accountability requirements between its principals.

AB - We consider sociotechnical systems (STSs) that facilitate social interaction among autonomous principals (either humans or organizations). Although accountability is a foundational concept in such systems, established requirements engineering methods do not support accountability in the broad sense of calling to account of one party by another. To address this short-coming, we propose the notion of accountability requirement. Further, we claim that to model an STS means to precisely capture the accountability requirements between its principals.

U2 - 10.1109/RELAW.2014.6893477

DO - 10.1109/RELAW.2014.6893477

M3 - Abstract

SP - 22

EP - 22

Y2 - 26 August 2014 through 26 August 2014

ER -