Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Theorising "small" and "micro" state behaviour ...
View graph of relations

Theorising "small" and "micro" state behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Theorising "small" and "micro" state behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal. / Misra, Amalendu.
In: Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2004, p. 133-148.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Misra A. Theorising "small" and "micro" state behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal. Contemporary South Asia. 2004;13(2):133-148. doi: 10.1080/0958493042000242927

Author

Misra, Amalendu. / Theorising "small" and "micro" state behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal. In: Contemporary South Asia. 2004 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 133-148.

Bibtex

@article{631bff6a333d4bf0b53160c1c94e395c,
title = "Theorising {"}small{"} and {"}micro{"} state behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal.",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to examine the normative justification of 'small' and 'micro' state behaviour. Whatever theoretical position one assumes in order to examine the issue of small state performance, some pertinent facts appear fairly consistent including their vulnerability to external forces, inability to interact effectively with the outside world, and relative backwardness. Adopting a comparative approach for the consistent elaboration of the analysis, this article concentrates on Bhutan, Nepal and the Maldives. Its focused comparison ensures that both the specificities and the generalities are addressed in all three cases. Using the Weberian notion of 'patrimonialism', this study highlights the peculiar 'power politics' that is prevalent in these polities, and shows how it dominates the discourse on democracy. By cross-examining various developmental theories, its also asks whether there is any basis to the axiom that 'small states are generally backward' and destined to remain so. The overwhelming picture that emerges from this investigation highlights the facets of state failure. The paper concludes with an assessment of the place and context of small state in a globalised world.",
author = "Amalendu Misra",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1080/0958493042000242927",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "133--148",
journal = "Contemporary South Asia",
issn = "0958-4935",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theorising "small" and "micro" state behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal.

AU - Misra, Amalendu

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The aim of this paper is to examine the normative justification of 'small' and 'micro' state behaviour. Whatever theoretical position one assumes in order to examine the issue of small state performance, some pertinent facts appear fairly consistent including their vulnerability to external forces, inability to interact effectively with the outside world, and relative backwardness. Adopting a comparative approach for the consistent elaboration of the analysis, this article concentrates on Bhutan, Nepal and the Maldives. Its focused comparison ensures that both the specificities and the generalities are addressed in all three cases. Using the Weberian notion of 'patrimonialism', this study highlights the peculiar 'power politics' that is prevalent in these polities, and shows how it dominates the discourse on democracy. By cross-examining various developmental theories, its also asks whether there is any basis to the axiom that 'small states are generally backward' and destined to remain so. The overwhelming picture that emerges from this investigation highlights the facets of state failure. The paper concludes with an assessment of the place and context of small state in a globalised world.

AB - The aim of this paper is to examine the normative justification of 'small' and 'micro' state behaviour. Whatever theoretical position one assumes in order to examine the issue of small state performance, some pertinent facts appear fairly consistent including their vulnerability to external forces, inability to interact effectively with the outside world, and relative backwardness. Adopting a comparative approach for the consistent elaboration of the analysis, this article concentrates on Bhutan, Nepal and the Maldives. Its focused comparison ensures that both the specificities and the generalities are addressed in all three cases. Using the Weberian notion of 'patrimonialism', this study highlights the peculiar 'power politics' that is prevalent in these polities, and shows how it dominates the discourse on democracy. By cross-examining various developmental theories, its also asks whether there is any basis to the axiom that 'small states are generally backward' and destined to remain so. The overwhelming picture that emerges from this investigation highlights the facets of state failure. The paper concludes with an assessment of the place and context of small state in a globalised world.

U2 - 10.1080/0958493042000242927

DO - 10.1080/0958493042000242927

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 133

EP - 148

JO - Contemporary South Asia

JF - Contemporary South Asia

SN - 0958-4935

IS - 2

ER -