Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > "They seem to think we're better than you": Fra...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

"They seem to think we're better than you": Framing football support as a matter of 'national identity'

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

"They seem to think we're better than you": Framing football support as a matter of 'national identity'. / Abell, Jacqueline.
In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2011, p. 246-264.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Abell J. "They seem to think we're better than you": Framing football support as a matter of 'national identity'. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2011;50(2):246-264. doi: 10.1348/014466610X514200

Author

Abell, Jacqueline. / "They seem to think we're better than you": Framing football support as a matter of 'national identity'. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 246-264.

Bibtex

@article{b50f47d552244919ba6dd6db468343dc,
title = "{"}They seem to think we're better than you{"}: Framing football support as a matter of 'national identity'",
abstract = "Within social psychology, studies of the nation have typically been understood in terms of national identity. Criticisms have been made of the tendency to conflate {\textquoteleft}being{\textquoteright} a member of a national category with psychological attachment to the group and its members.Furthermore, ethnomethodologically informed approaches have argued that little has been said about when and how social actors frame matters as one of national identity. Taking the example of national football support, this study considers the circumstances under which football may be cast as a matter of national identity, and when such ascriptions are resisted. Interviews were conducted with participants born and resident in England and Scotland, whereas in Scotland national football support is treated as a matter of national identity for Scottish and English people, in England it is separated from a collective sense of English identity. Adopting a discursive analytic stance, this study examines the internal and external attribution of national stereotypes and considers their role in managing issues of social causality, justification of in-group behaviour, and the differentiation of national groups.",
keywords = "football, national identity, England, Scotland",
author = "Jacqueline Abell",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1348/014466610X514200",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "246--264",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "They seem to think we're better than you": Framing football support as a matter of 'national identity'

AU - Abell, Jacqueline

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Within social psychology, studies of the nation have typically been understood in terms of national identity. Criticisms have been made of the tendency to conflate ‘being’ a member of a national category with psychological attachment to the group and its members.Furthermore, ethnomethodologically informed approaches have argued that little has been said about when and how social actors frame matters as one of national identity. Taking the example of national football support, this study considers the circumstances under which football may be cast as a matter of national identity, and when such ascriptions are resisted. Interviews were conducted with participants born and resident in England and Scotland, whereas in Scotland national football support is treated as a matter of national identity for Scottish and English people, in England it is separated from a collective sense of English identity. Adopting a discursive analytic stance, this study examines the internal and external attribution of national stereotypes and considers their role in managing issues of social causality, justification of in-group behaviour, and the differentiation of national groups.

AB - Within social psychology, studies of the nation have typically been understood in terms of national identity. Criticisms have been made of the tendency to conflate ‘being’ a member of a national category with psychological attachment to the group and its members.Furthermore, ethnomethodologically informed approaches have argued that little has been said about when and how social actors frame matters as one of national identity. Taking the example of national football support, this study considers the circumstances under which football may be cast as a matter of national identity, and when such ascriptions are resisted. Interviews were conducted with participants born and resident in England and Scotland, whereas in Scotland national football support is treated as a matter of national identity for Scottish and English people, in England it is separated from a collective sense of English identity. Adopting a discursive analytic stance, this study examines the internal and external attribution of national stereotypes and considers their role in managing issues of social causality, justification of in-group behaviour, and the differentiation of national groups.

KW - football, national identity, England, Scotland

U2 - 10.1348/014466610X514200

DO - 10.1348/014466610X514200

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 246

EP - 264

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

IS - 2

ER -