Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Thinking systemically, thinking political: Buil...
View graph of relations

Thinking systemically, thinking political: Building strong partnerships with families in the context of rising inequality?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Thinking systemically, thinking political: Building strong partnerships with families in the context of rising inequality? / Featherstone, B.; Broadhurst, Karen; Holt, K. E.
In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2012, p. 618-633.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Featherstone B, Broadhurst K, Holt KE. Thinking systemically, thinking political: Building strong partnerships with families in the context of rising inequality? British Journal of Social Work. 2012;42(4):618-633. Epub 2011 Jun 7. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

Author

Featherstone, B. ; Broadhurst, Karen ; Holt, K. E. / Thinking systemically, thinking political: Building strong partnerships with families in the context of rising inequality?. In: British Journal of Social Work. 2012 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 618-633.

Bibtex

@article{98d5fa7615034fc1aceb46047d55a93d,
title = "Thinking systemically, thinking political: Building strong partnerships with families in the context of rising inequality?",
abstract = "Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers' ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labour's modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection. ",
keywords = " Child protection, child welfare, family support , social policy",
author = "B. Featherstone and Karen Broadhurst and Holt, {K. E.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcr080",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "618--633",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking systemically, thinking political: Building strong partnerships with families in the context of rising inequality?

AU - Featherstone, B.

AU - Broadhurst, Karen

AU - Holt, K. E.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers' ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labour's modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection.

AB - Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers' ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labour's modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection.

KW - Child protection

KW - child welfare

KW - family support

KW - social policy

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 618

EP - 633

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 4

ER -