12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Thought experiments.
View graph of relations

« Back

Thought experiments.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date04/2005
JournalMetaphilosophy
Journal number3
Volume36
Number of pages20
Pages328-347
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain how thought experiments work, and also the reasons why they can fail. The paper is split into four sections. The first argues that thought experiments in philosophy and science should be treated together. The second examines existing accounts of thought experiments, and shows why they are inadequate. The third proposes a better account of thought experiments. According to this account, a thought experimenter manipulates her world view in accord with the �what if� questions posed by a thought experiment. When all necessary manipulations are carried through the result is either a consistent model, or contradiction. If a consistent model is achieved the thought experimenter can conclude that the scenario is possible, if a consistent model cannot be constructed then the scenario is not possible. The fourth section of the paper uses this account to shed light on the circumstances in which thought experiments fail.

Bibliographic note

The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com (c) Blackwell 2006.