Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Thrones and dominations

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Thrones and dominations: stabilization clauses and national sovereignty

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Thrones and dominations: stabilization clauses and national sovereignty. / Le Peuch, Yohan; Austen-Baker, Richard.
In: La Revue des Juriste de Sciences Po, No. 8, 2013, p. 83-87.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Le Peuch Y, Austen-Baker R. Thrones and dominations: stabilization clauses and national sovereignty. La Revue des Juriste de Sciences Po. 2013;(8):83-87.

Author

Le Peuch, Yohan ; Austen-Baker, Richard. / Thrones and dominations : stabilization clauses and national sovereignty. In: La Revue des Juriste de Sciences Po. 2013 ; No. 8. pp. 83-87.

Bibtex

@article{b6e8cfa60779401592aced82401cd245,
title = "Thrones and dominations: stabilization clauses and national sovereignty",
abstract = "Scholarly literature (and political discussion) of stabilization clauses tends to assume that the aim of these clauses is to place limits on the exercise of sovereign power by States who are contracting parties. It is then argued either that this works to evil, in restraining due development of ethical, environmental and human rights standards in the countries concerned or else that they are ineffective, since sovereignty cannot be contractually limited, and are therefore useless. This article argues that neither of these positions is correct; rather, the clauses provide for financial adjustment between contracting parties when legal changes are made by the State co-party, thus facilitating risk management on the part of the non-State co-party. The greater certainty thereby engendered permits the non-State party to agree to the contract at a cost more favourable to the State party than might otherwise be the case.",
author = "{Le Peuch}, Yohan and Richard Austen-Baker",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
pages = "83--87",
journal = "La Revue des Juriste de Sciences Po",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thrones and dominations

T2 - stabilization clauses and national sovereignty

AU - Le Peuch, Yohan

AU - Austen-Baker, Richard

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Scholarly literature (and political discussion) of stabilization clauses tends to assume that the aim of these clauses is to place limits on the exercise of sovereign power by States who are contracting parties. It is then argued either that this works to evil, in restraining due development of ethical, environmental and human rights standards in the countries concerned or else that they are ineffective, since sovereignty cannot be contractually limited, and are therefore useless. This article argues that neither of these positions is correct; rather, the clauses provide for financial adjustment between contracting parties when legal changes are made by the State co-party, thus facilitating risk management on the part of the non-State co-party. The greater certainty thereby engendered permits the non-State party to agree to the contract at a cost more favourable to the State party than might otherwise be the case.

AB - Scholarly literature (and political discussion) of stabilization clauses tends to assume that the aim of these clauses is to place limits on the exercise of sovereign power by States who are contracting parties. It is then argued either that this works to evil, in restraining due development of ethical, environmental and human rights standards in the countries concerned or else that they are ineffective, since sovereignty cannot be contractually limited, and are therefore useless. This article argues that neither of these positions is correct; rather, the clauses provide for financial adjustment between contracting parties when legal changes are made by the State co-party, thus facilitating risk management on the part of the non-State co-party. The greater certainty thereby engendered permits the non-State party to agree to the contract at a cost more favourable to the State party than might otherwise be the case.

M3 - Journal article

SP - 83

EP - 87

JO - La Revue des Juriste de Sciences Po

JF - La Revue des Juriste de Sciences Po

IS - 8

ER -