Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and ...
View graph of relations

Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology. / Hyman, Gavin L.
In: Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1998, p. 394-412.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hyman, GL 1998, 'Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology.', Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 394-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00086

APA

Hyman, G. L. (1998). Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology. Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, 39(4), 394-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00086

Vancouver

Hyman GL. Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology. Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology. 1998;39(4):394-412. doi: 10.1111/1468-2265.00086

Author

Hyman, Gavin L. / Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology. In: Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology. 1998 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 394-412.

Bibtex

@article{d2e244044a734626ac5f0ec8e6736576,
title = "Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology.",
abstract = "This paper proffers an example of a new form of religious dialogue. It subverts, rather than assumes the philosophical tradition of universal reason, upon which religious dialogue has traditionally proceeded. To this end, I call into question the frequently perceived affinity between Buddhism and radical postmodern a/theology. Whereas the latter works within a framework of oppositions inherited from the modern philosophical tradition, Buddhism is innocent of such a framework, and jettisons its {\textquoteleft}either-or{\textquoteright} antinomies. In this respect, I argue that there is a striking {\textquoteleft}coincidence in outlook{\textquoteright} between Buddhism and conservative postmodern theology, which also seeks to subvert the modern philosophical framework which it regards as being essentially secular. I suggest that this {\textquoteleft}coincidence in outlook{\textquoteright}, which contrasts with the modern outlook, opens the way for a religious dialogue based on a mutual affirmation of difference, rather than on the distorting universalist quest for affinity at all costs.",
author = "Hyman, {Gavin L.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1111/1468-2265.00086",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "394--412",
journal = "Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology",
issn = "0018-1196",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a New Religious Dialogue: Buddhism and Postmodern Theology.

AU - Hyman, Gavin L.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This paper proffers an example of a new form of religious dialogue. It subverts, rather than assumes the philosophical tradition of universal reason, upon which religious dialogue has traditionally proceeded. To this end, I call into question the frequently perceived affinity between Buddhism and radical postmodern a/theology. Whereas the latter works within a framework of oppositions inherited from the modern philosophical tradition, Buddhism is innocent of such a framework, and jettisons its ‘either-or’ antinomies. In this respect, I argue that there is a striking ‘coincidence in outlook’ between Buddhism and conservative postmodern theology, which also seeks to subvert the modern philosophical framework which it regards as being essentially secular. I suggest that this ‘coincidence in outlook’, which contrasts with the modern outlook, opens the way for a religious dialogue based on a mutual affirmation of difference, rather than on the distorting universalist quest for affinity at all costs.

AB - This paper proffers an example of a new form of religious dialogue. It subverts, rather than assumes the philosophical tradition of universal reason, upon which religious dialogue has traditionally proceeded. To this end, I call into question the frequently perceived affinity between Buddhism and radical postmodern a/theology. Whereas the latter works within a framework of oppositions inherited from the modern philosophical tradition, Buddhism is innocent of such a framework, and jettisons its ‘either-or’ antinomies. In this respect, I argue that there is a striking ‘coincidence in outlook’ between Buddhism and conservative postmodern theology, which also seeks to subvert the modern philosophical framework which it regards as being essentially secular. I suggest that this ‘coincidence in outlook’, which contrasts with the modern outlook, opens the way for a religious dialogue based on a mutual affirmation of difference, rather than on the distorting universalist quest for affinity at all costs.

U2 - 10.1111/1468-2265.00086

DO - 10.1111/1468-2265.00086

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 394

EP - 412

JO - Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology

JF - Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology

SN - 0018-1196

IS - 4

ER -