Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report

Electronic data

  • TOAR_Chapter1_Resubmission_clean

    Accepted author manuscript, 3.36 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100. / Archibald, A. T.; Neu, J. L.; Elshorbany, Y. et al.
In: Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, Vol. 8, No. 1, 034, 30.12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Archibald, AT, Neu, JL, Elshorbany, Y, Cooper, OR, Young, PJ, Akiyoshi, H, Cox, RA, Coyle, M, Derwent, R, Deushi, M, Finco, A, Frost, GJ, Galbally, IE, Gerosa, G, Granier, C, Griffiths, PT, Hossaini, R, Hu, L, Jöckel, P, Josse, B, Mertens, M, Morgenstern, O, Naja, M, Naik, V, Oltmans, S, Plummer, DA, Revell, LE, Saiz-Lopez, A, Saxena, P, Shin, YM, Shaahid, I, Shallcross, D, Tilmes, S, Trickl, T, Wallington, TJ, Worden, HM & Zeng, G 2020, 'Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100', Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, vol. 8, no. 1, 034. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034

APA

Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Deushi, M., Finco, A., Frost, G. J., Galbally, I. E., Gerosa, G., Granier, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hossaini, R., Hu, L., Jöckel, P., ... Zeng, G. (2020). Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8(1), Article 034. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034

Vancouver

Archibald AT, Neu JL, Elshorbany Y, Cooper OR, Young PJ, Akiyoshi H et al. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 2020 Dec 30;8(1):034. doi: 10.1525/elementa.2020.034

Author

Archibald, A. T. ; Neu, J. L. ; Elshorbany, Y. et al. / Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report : A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100. In: Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 2020 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{35440133c70e48cea4673ded5bf7bf6d,
title = "Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100",
abstract = "Our understanding of the processes that control the burden and budget of tropospheric ozone have changed dramatically over the last 60 years. Models are the key tools used to understand these changes and these underscore that there are many processes important in controlling the tropospheric ozone budget. In this critical review we assess our evolving understanding of these processes, both physical and chemical. We review model simulations from the IGAC Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and Chemistry ClimateModelling Initiative (CCMI) to assess the changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and its budget from 1850-2010. Analysis of these data indicates that there has been significant growth in the ozone burden from 1850-2000 (~ 43±9%), but smaller growth between 1960-2000 (~16±10%) and that the models simulate burdens of ozone well within recent satellite estimates.The CCMI model ozone budgets indicate that the net chemical production of ozone in the troposphere plateaued in the 1990s and has not changed since then inspite of increases in the burden. There has been a shift in net ozone production in the troposphere being greatest in the Northern mid and high latitudes to the Northern tropics; driven by the regional evolution of precursor emissions. An analysis of the evolution of tropospheric ozone through the 21st century, as simulated by CMIP5 models, reveals a large source of uncertainty associated withmodels themselves (i.e. in the way that they simulate the chemical and physical processes that control tropospheric ozone). This structural uncertainty is greatest in the near term (two to three decades) but emissions scenarios dominate uncertainty in the longer-term (2050-2100) evolution of tropospheric ozone. This intrinsic model uncertainty prevents robust predictions of near-term changes in the tropospheric ozone burden, and we review how progress can be made to reduce this limitation. ",
keywords = "Ozone, Tropospheric chemistry, Ozone budget, Chemistry transport models, Tropospheric ozone",
author = "Archibald, {A. T.} and Neu, {J. L.} and Y. Elshorbany and Cooper, {O. R.} and P.J. Young and H. Akiyoshi and R.A. Cox and M. Coyle and R. Derwent and M. Deushi and A. Finco and G.J. Frost and Galbally, {I. E.} and G. Gerosa and C. Granier and P.T. Griffiths and R. Hossaini and L. Hu and P. J{\"o}ckel and B. Josse and M. Mertens and O. Morgenstern and M. Naja and V. Naik and S. Oltmans and D.A. Plummer and L.E. Revell and A. Saiz-Lopez and P. Saxena and Y.M. Shin and I. Shaahid and D. Shallcross and S. Tilmes and T. Trickl and Wallington, {T. J.} and Worden, {H. M.} and G. Zeng",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1525/elementa.2020.034",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene",
issn = "2325-1026",
publisher = "BioOne",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report

T2 - A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1960–2100

AU - Archibald, A. T.

AU - Neu, J. L.

AU - Elshorbany, Y.

AU - Cooper, O. R.

AU - Young, P.J.

AU - Akiyoshi, H.

AU - Cox, R.A.

AU - Coyle, M.

AU - Derwent, R.

AU - Deushi, M.

AU - Finco, A.

AU - Frost, G.J.

AU - Galbally, I. E.

AU - Gerosa, G.

AU - Granier, C.

AU - Griffiths, P.T.

AU - Hossaini, R.

AU - Hu, L.

AU - Jöckel, P.

AU - Josse, B.

AU - Mertens, M.

AU - Morgenstern, O.

AU - Naja, M.

AU - Naik, V.

AU - Oltmans, S.

AU - Plummer, D.A.

AU - Revell, L.E.

AU - Saiz-Lopez, A.

AU - Saxena, P.

AU - Shin, Y.M.

AU - Shaahid, I.

AU - Shallcross, D.

AU - Tilmes, S.

AU - Trickl, T.

AU - Wallington, T. J.

AU - Worden, H. M.

AU - Zeng, G.

PY - 2020/12/30

Y1 - 2020/12/30

N2 - Our understanding of the processes that control the burden and budget of tropospheric ozone have changed dramatically over the last 60 years. Models are the key tools used to understand these changes and these underscore that there are many processes important in controlling the tropospheric ozone budget. In this critical review we assess our evolving understanding of these processes, both physical and chemical. We review model simulations from the IGAC Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and Chemistry ClimateModelling Initiative (CCMI) to assess the changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and its budget from 1850-2010. Analysis of these data indicates that there has been significant growth in the ozone burden from 1850-2000 (~ 43±9%), but smaller growth between 1960-2000 (~16±10%) and that the models simulate burdens of ozone well within recent satellite estimates.The CCMI model ozone budgets indicate that the net chemical production of ozone in the troposphere plateaued in the 1990s and has not changed since then inspite of increases in the burden. There has been a shift in net ozone production in the troposphere being greatest in the Northern mid and high latitudes to the Northern tropics; driven by the regional evolution of precursor emissions. An analysis of the evolution of tropospheric ozone through the 21st century, as simulated by CMIP5 models, reveals a large source of uncertainty associated withmodels themselves (i.e. in the way that they simulate the chemical and physical processes that control tropospheric ozone). This structural uncertainty is greatest in the near term (two to three decades) but emissions scenarios dominate uncertainty in the longer-term (2050-2100) evolution of tropospheric ozone. This intrinsic model uncertainty prevents robust predictions of near-term changes in the tropospheric ozone burden, and we review how progress can be made to reduce this limitation.

AB - Our understanding of the processes that control the burden and budget of tropospheric ozone have changed dramatically over the last 60 years. Models are the key tools used to understand these changes and these underscore that there are many processes important in controlling the tropospheric ozone budget. In this critical review we assess our evolving understanding of these processes, both physical and chemical. We review model simulations from the IGAC Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and Chemistry ClimateModelling Initiative (CCMI) to assess the changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and its budget from 1850-2010. Analysis of these data indicates that there has been significant growth in the ozone burden from 1850-2000 (~ 43±9%), but smaller growth between 1960-2000 (~16±10%) and that the models simulate burdens of ozone well within recent satellite estimates.The CCMI model ozone budgets indicate that the net chemical production of ozone in the troposphere plateaued in the 1990s and has not changed since then inspite of increases in the burden. There has been a shift in net ozone production in the troposphere being greatest in the Northern mid and high latitudes to the Northern tropics; driven by the regional evolution of precursor emissions. An analysis of the evolution of tropospheric ozone through the 21st century, as simulated by CMIP5 models, reveals a large source of uncertainty associated withmodels themselves (i.e. in the way that they simulate the chemical and physical processes that control tropospheric ozone). This structural uncertainty is greatest in the near term (two to three decades) but emissions scenarios dominate uncertainty in the longer-term (2050-2100) evolution of tropospheric ozone. This intrinsic model uncertainty prevents robust predictions of near-term changes in the tropospheric ozone burden, and we review how progress can be made to reduce this limitation.

KW - Ozone

KW - Tropospheric chemistry

KW - Ozone budget

KW - Chemistry transport models

KW - Tropospheric ozone

U2 - 10.1525/elementa.2020.034

DO - 10.1525/elementa.2020.034

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene

JF - Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene

SN - 2325-1026

IS - 1

M1 - 034

ER -