Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Trust-based specification of sociotechnical sys...
View graph of relations

Trust-based specification of sociotechnical systems

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Trust-based specification of sociotechnical systems. / Paja, Elda; Chopra, Amit K.; Giorgini, Paolo.
In: Data and Knowledge Engineering, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Paja E, Chopra AK, Giorgini P. Trust-based specification of sociotechnical systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 2013. Epub 2012 Dec 23. doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2012.12.005

Author

Paja, Elda ; Chopra, Amit K. ; Giorgini, Paolo. / Trust-based specification of sociotechnical systems. In: Data and Knowledge Engineering. 2013.

Bibtex

@article{ae914a315f204711b0b7c1058324bb56,
title = "Trust-based specification of sociotechnical systems",
abstract = "Current approaches in sociotechnical systems consider trust to be either cognitive—referring to actors' mental models of each other—or technical—referring to an actor's trust of a technical artifact. In this paper, we take a more expansive view of trust: in addition to the cognitive, we also consider trust in the architectural sense, which we term sociotechnical trust. Broadly, sociotechnical trust applies at the level of roles. Our principal claim is that sociotechnical systems are essentially specified in terms of sociotechnical trust. Whereas previous work has considered dependencies between actors as a fundamental social relation, we claim that no dependency can exist without the corresponding sociotechnical trust.Our contributions are threefold. One, we qualitatively show sociotechnical trust to be different from cognitive and technical trust and the prevalent notions of dependencies among actors. Two, we specify a conceptual model of systems based on sociotechnical trust. We introduce the novel idea of one trust relation supporting another, which enables us to compare sociotechnical systems for trustworthiness. Three, we specify a methodology for engineering trustworthy sociotechnical systems. We evaluate our approach by modeling some aspects of a European food safety legislation.",
keywords = "Conceptual modeling , Methodologies and tools , Sociotechnical systems , Roles , Trust",
author = "Elda Paja and Chopra, {Amit K.} and Paolo Giorgini",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.datak.2012.12.005",
language = "English",
journal = "Data and Knowledge Engineering",
issn = "0169-023X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust-based specification of sociotechnical systems

AU - Paja, Elda

AU - Chopra, Amit K.

AU - Giorgini, Paolo

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Current approaches in sociotechnical systems consider trust to be either cognitive—referring to actors' mental models of each other—or technical—referring to an actor's trust of a technical artifact. In this paper, we take a more expansive view of trust: in addition to the cognitive, we also consider trust in the architectural sense, which we term sociotechnical trust. Broadly, sociotechnical trust applies at the level of roles. Our principal claim is that sociotechnical systems are essentially specified in terms of sociotechnical trust. Whereas previous work has considered dependencies between actors as a fundamental social relation, we claim that no dependency can exist without the corresponding sociotechnical trust.Our contributions are threefold. One, we qualitatively show sociotechnical trust to be different from cognitive and technical trust and the prevalent notions of dependencies among actors. Two, we specify a conceptual model of systems based on sociotechnical trust. We introduce the novel idea of one trust relation supporting another, which enables us to compare sociotechnical systems for trustworthiness. Three, we specify a methodology for engineering trustworthy sociotechnical systems. We evaluate our approach by modeling some aspects of a European food safety legislation.

AB - Current approaches in sociotechnical systems consider trust to be either cognitive—referring to actors' mental models of each other—or technical—referring to an actor's trust of a technical artifact. In this paper, we take a more expansive view of trust: in addition to the cognitive, we also consider trust in the architectural sense, which we term sociotechnical trust. Broadly, sociotechnical trust applies at the level of roles. Our principal claim is that sociotechnical systems are essentially specified in terms of sociotechnical trust. Whereas previous work has considered dependencies between actors as a fundamental social relation, we claim that no dependency can exist without the corresponding sociotechnical trust.Our contributions are threefold. One, we qualitatively show sociotechnical trust to be different from cognitive and technical trust and the prevalent notions of dependencies among actors. Two, we specify a conceptual model of systems based on sociotechnical trust. We introduce the novel idea of one trust relation supporting another, which enables us to compare sociotechnical systems for trustworthiness. Three, we specify a methodology for engineering trustworthy sociotechnical systems. We evaluate our approach by modeling some aspects of a European food safety legislation.

KW - Conceptual modeling

KW - Methodologies and tools

KW - Sociotechnical systems

KW - Roles

KW - Trust

U2 - 10.1016/j.datak.2012.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.datak.2012.12.005

M3 - Journal article

JO - Data and Knowledge Engineering

JF - Data and Knowledge Engineering

SN - 0169-023X

ER -